Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2013/11/16

[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]

Subject: [Leica] accurate framing (was: Re: for those interested in future Leica developments)
From: photo at frozenlight.eu (Nathan Wajsman)
Date: Sun, 17 Nov 2013 07:12:25 +0100
References: <20311681.1384656112852.JavaMail.root@elwamui-little.atl.sa.earthlink.net> <CAAsXt4MAmZcmUc8ZNGN2acoD-VuD=cbSUh34wQdirz9nwD+uWw@mail.gmail.com>

Excellent, Bob!

Cheers,
Nathan

Nathan Wajsman
Alicante, Spain
http://www.frozenlight.eu
http://www.greatpix.eu
PICTURE OF THE WEEK: http://www.fotocycle.dk/paws
Blog: http://nathansmusings.wordpress.com/

YNWA









On Nov 17, 2013, at 4:37 AM, Robert Adler wrote:

> I used the EVF on the M for the first time last week. Was with the 21mm and
> replaced the external 21mm finder. It had several advantages over the
> external 21mm finder:
> *   Framing was EXACT!
> *   Could see exactly what was in focus and adjust accordingly (using
> shutter half-depressed)
> *   And best of all, you can tilt it up so that the camera can be close to
> the ground allowing you to really get a perspective you used to have to lie
> down for
> Downside was a slight delay between depressing the shutter and the shutter
> firing, but I got used to that?
> 
> Here are a couple of the results; not the best images, but I don't blame
> the EVF for that!
> www.rgaphoto.com/21mmEVF
> 
> Really fun using it as a chimney finder; up to my calves in waves, so I
> don't think I could have gotten these without it other than guessing and
> with a horizon bubble level in the hot shoe..
> 
> 
> On Sat, Nov 16, 2013 at 6:41 PM, Doug Herr <wildlightphoto at 
> earthlink.net>wrote:
> 
>> FRANK DERNIE wrote:
>> 
>>>>> 
>> If you want accurate framing you will need a reflex camera or look at the
>> sensor output either via the screen on the back or an EVF, whether you 
>> like
>> it or not!
>> <<<
>> 
>> I agree... and even if it were possible to make the M frame lines 100%
>> accurate at the focussed distance parallax would make the foreground and
>> background and the spatial relationships between foreground, subject and
>> background inaccurate.  For 100% accuracy a minimum of TTL viewing is
>> required.
>> 
>> 
>> Doug Herr
>> Birdman of Sacramento
>> http://www.wildlightphoto.com
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> _______________________________________________
>> Leica Users Group.
>> See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information
>> 
> 
> 
> 
> -- 
> Bob Adler
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Leica Users Group.
> See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information
> 



In reply to: Message from wildlightphoto at earthlink.net (Doug Herr) ([Leica] accurate framing (was: Re: for those interested in future Leica developments))
Message from rgacpa at gmail.com (Robert Adler) ([Leica] accurate framing (was: Re: for those interested in future Leica developments))