Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2013/10/30

[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]

Subject: [Leica] Paper for b&w printing - for Scott G
From: leica at jayburleson.com (Jay Burleson)
Date: Wed, 30 Oct 2013 22:03:32 -0700
References: <5270688C.4090905@jayburleson.com> <0292A09E-0543-4C81-A368-F81A78055B39@mac.com>

Scott, if you are starting with a new printer, that has never had ink in 
it, then a conversion to b&w only inks is a piece of cake.
Buy the refillable cartridges, fill with ink, and install.
A little more involved if you have to purge the color inks. 
(http://www.piezography.com/PiezoPress/technical-support/)
I bought a used R3000 because it was a good deal and came set up with 
the b&w K7 inks. 
(http://shopping.netsuite.com/s.nl/c.362672/sc.15/category.54255/.f)
Otherwise, I'd have probably bought a 3880, but never researched it.
The Piezography carbon inks use Quadtone RIP, 
(http://www.quadtonerip.com/html/QTRoverview.html) and Piezography 
provides many curves for popular papers.
I am more than happy with the image quality. The results on matte paper 
are as good as what I was able to get from the wet darkroom; and I 
prided myself on the quality of my darkroom printing ability.
I can't wait to try printing on some exhibition type papers.

Jay

On 10/30/2013 11:36 AM, Scott Gregory wrote:
> Jay I would be interested to know your thoughts concerning quality of the 
> 3000 Epson and the results you are achieving with your mono inks.
> Is there much conversion that needs to happen to the printer to get it 
> going mono?
> Also I'm looking to replace my old 2200 Epson and I've been using the 
> Image Print Rip with the 2200.
> Last I checked with Image Print in Florida they suggested going with the 
> 3880 since it was more of a professional build than the 3000 and which 
> they told me was giving some issues early on. Perhaps those issues have 
> been corrected though? Anyway I'd rather spend in the area of the 3000's 
> price range for what I do. And I'm not really too keen on shelling out the 
> amount of $$$ Image Print wants for a Rip these days, even though it is a 
> good product. So part of my question is are you printing your Leica black 
> and white photos on the 3000 using the paper profiles from the 
> manufacturer or are you in fact using a Rip?
> Thanks for your thoughts!
>
> Scott
>
>> On Oct 29, 2013, at 10:01 PM, Jay Burleson <leica at jayburleson.com> 
>> wrote:
>>
>> I've got my R3000 with Piezography b&w ink up and printing beautiful 
>> Monochrom images (thanks Dave!).
>> I dislike matte finish paper, and also the high gloss RC paper look.
>> I've a bunch of stuff to print out by Christmas.
>> Looking for input on a general purpose (NOT exhibition weight or cost) 
>> type of paper, that looks like air dried glossy fiber papers from the wet 
>> darkroom days.
>> Any ideas?
>>
>> Thank you kindly,

-- 
Jay,

Jay Burleson Gallery <http://jayburleson.com/leica/gallery/index.php/>
"Being a Leica customer is like dating the most beautiful girl in the 
world...
who cares more about herself than you... but, you keep calling her back 
anyway...
because the sex is so good... most of the time." (RickLeica on LUF)


Replies: Reply from scottgregory at mac.com (Scott Gregory) ([Leica] Paper for b&w printing - for Scott G)
In reply to: Message from leica at jayburleson.com (Jay Burleson) ([Leica] Paper for b&w printing)
Message from scottgregory at mac.com (Scott Gregory) ([Leica] Paper for b&w printing)