Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2013/10/22
[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]I think I may still have them on my dusty Dell computer's hard drive. I'll take a look this evening. Jeffery On Tue, Oct 22, 2013 at 9:04 AM, Steve Barbour <steve.barbour at gmail.com>wrote: > > On Oct 21, 2013, at 9:21 PM, Jeffery Smith <jsmith342 at gmail.com> wrote: > > > Yeah, I shot some low light wide open shots of some of my high school > classmates about 4 years ago. I thought they were good, but the pics > weren't received well on the LUG. They really can't compare to the Noctilux > picture quality, but for an amateur the lens is worth the money. > > > any chance of my seeing them Jeffery? > > if possible, > > > much appreciated, > > > > Steve > > > > > > > > > Ken Rockwell despises it, but who knows why. I wouldn't consider selling > mine. > > > > Sent from my iPad > > > > Jeffery L. Smith > > New Orleans, Louisiana > > USA > > > > On Oct 21, 2013, at 22:58, Steve Barbour <steve.barbour at gmail.com> > wrote: > > > >> > >> On Oct 21, 2013, at 3:05 PM, Jeffery Smith <jsmith342 at gmail.com> > >> wrote: > >> > >>> By the way, I picked up the newly revised Voigtlander 50/1.5 Nokton > from Stephen Gandy a short while back, but haven't had a break at work long > enough to allow me to use it. > >> > >> > >> > >> have you used the Voigtlander Nokton 50mm f1.1 ? Impression? > >> > >> > >>> > >>> Jeffery > >>> > >>> > >>> On Oct 21, 2013, at 2:16 PM, Steve Barbour <steve.barbour at gmail.com> > wrote: > >>> > >>>> you guys need to talk with Jeffery Smith > >>>> > >>>> > >>>> > >>>> s > >>>> > >>>> > >>>> > >>>> > >>>> On Oct 21, 2013, at 12:09 PM, John McMaster <john at mcmaster.co.nz> > wrote: > >>>> > >>>>> I have a quantity of 50mm lenses (my most used focal length) from > 1950s DR to current FLE, they all have a different look with good and bad > points for each ;-) > >>>>> > >>>>> john > >>>>> > >>>>>> -----Original Message----- > >>>>>> Overgaard ranks the various 50 mm lenses with the best being the > latest with > >>>>>> a floating element. Bear in mind that the differences are subtile > and certainly > >>>>>> not apparent on a computer screen. In fact I doubt that you could > see any > >>>>>> difference in lens quality short of examining a really large sized > paper print. A > >>>>>> good read, though. Thanks, Steve. > >>>>>> Larry Z > >>>>>> > >>>>> > >>>>> _______________________________________________ > >>>>> Leica Users Group. > >>>>> See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information > >>>> > >>>> > >>>> _______________________________________________ > >>>> Leica Users Group. > >>>> See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information > >>> > >>> > >>> _______________________________________________ > >>> Leica Users Group. > >>> See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information > >> > >> > >> _______________________________________________ > >> Leica Users Group. > >> See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information > > > > _______________________________________________ > > Leica Users Group. > > See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information > > > _______________________________________________ > Leica Users Group. > See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information > -- Jeffery L. Smith New Orleans, LA