Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2013/10/15

[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]

Subject: [Leica] OT - Full Frame Mirrorless
From: photo at frozenlight.eu (Nathan Wajsman)
Date: Tue, 15 Oct 2013 19:55:31 +0200
References: <CAH1UNJ0cYoJs3emOZY-jEBc_P=-t0Dg=yrtFAGpq8sxdDrbsTQ@mail.gmail.com> <07b701cec9b0$13f5dc70$3be19550$@verizon.net> <CA+=0raDnQ15jMnSU2tcZDmCp8_yP19h=pTUM6uTokCQnd4NWig@mail.gmail.com> <082701cec9cd$1943b770$4bcb2650$@verizon.net>

Yawn. If I want a larger sensor, I can buy an M9.


On 15 Oct 2013, at 19:36, Frank Filippone <red735i at verizon.net> wrote:

> I do not see a downside to this camera...  
> 
> The issue with the WA lenses, and obtuse light ray angles is still TBD.  
> 
> Leica should buy the camera, stick on a M mount, do a little bit of FW
> revision for its lenses,  and sell it as an entry level M camera.
> 
> Maybe Leitax will do it....?
> 
> Frank Filippone
> Red735i at verizon.net
> 
> 
> 
> frank e mount is nex. so u are ready to go
> 
> 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Leica Users Group.
> See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information
> 

Nathan WajsmanAlicante, Spain
http://www.frozenlight.eu
http://www.greatpix.eu

Books: http://www.blurb.com/bookstore/search?search=wajsman&x=0&y=0
PICTURE OF THE WEEK: http://www.fotocycle.dk/paws
Image licensing: http://www.alamy.com/search-results.asp?qt=wajsman
Blog: 
http://www.nathansmusings.eu/






In reply to: Message from jayanand at gmail.com (Jayanand Govindaraj) ([Leica] OT - Full Frame Mirrorless)
Message from red735i at verizon.net (Frank Filippone) ([Leica] OT - Full Frame Mirrorless)
Message from msadat at gmail.com (mehrdad) ([Leica] OT - Full Frame Mirrorless)
Message from red735i at verizon.net (Frank Filippone) ([Leica] OT - Full Frame Mirrorless)