Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2013/08/12

[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]

Subject: [Leica] IMGs: On Assignment (from Ted Grant): Motion GEORGE LOTTERMOSER.
From: imagist3 at mac.com (George Lottermoser)
Date: Mon, 12 Aug 2013 08:56:14 -0500
References: <CC162AFF-2ADE-43C7-B5B7-BDDBC22DF8FB@mac.com> <63B263C6186C4966AEAA0597BD9D8383@syneticfeba505>

On Aug 10, 2013, at 11:28 PM, tedgrant at shaw.ca wrote:

> George Lottermoser SHOWED:

>> c & c always welcome and appreciated
>> 
>> <http://www.imagist.com/blog/?p=7725>
> 
> Hi George,,
> Good motion, enough blurr to see what it is and feel their riding and 
> moving. The amount of blurr of the moving object and the 
> background/foreground should never be so much the scene merely becomes a 
> mass of colours or B&W and not recognizable what it really is in the 
> photograph.
> 
> In your case they are about right. I think using this technique is better 
> illustrated in colour than B&W! That's always a debatable question between 
> photographers. :-) However we wont debate! ;-)

Thanks for taking the time to play with us Ted.

I did include one color version at the bottom; for comparison.
Every time I compared the color with the black and white
I found the color to be a visual distraction.

YMMV

Regards,
George Lottermoser 
george at imagist.com
http://www.imagist.com
http://www.imagist.com/blog
http://www.linkedin.com/in/imagist







Replies: Reply from tedgrant at shaw.ca (tedgrant at shaw.ca) ([Leica] IMGs: On Assignment (from Ted Grant): Motion GEORGE LOTTERMOSER. EDITOR RESPONSE!)
In reply to: Message from imagist3 at mac.com (George Lottermoser) ([Leica] IMGs: On Assignment (from Ted Grant): Motion)
Message from tedgrant at shaw.ca (tedgrant at shaw.ca) ([Leica] IMGs: On Assignment (from Ted Grant): Motion GEORGE LOTTERMOSER.)