Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2013/08/10

[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]

Subject: [Leica] Single element lens
From: ric at cartersxrd.net (RicCarter)
Date: Sat, 10 Aug 2013 10:41:33 -0400
References: <8D063ED993589B1-BE0-EC50@Webmail-m112.sysops.aol.com>

it's a quite pleasant look

ric


On Aug 10, 2013, at 10:32 AM, lrzeitlin at aol.com wrote:

> Back in the Dark Ages when I studied astronomy, astronomers still used 
> single element lenses in refractor telescopes for many types of solar 
> observations. Before the widespread use of lens coating, single element 
> lenses, or at worst a dual element cemented achromat, had less flare than 
> the much more highly corrected multielement anastigmat lenses. With long 
> focal lengths, a narrow angle of view, and a maximum aperture of f11 these 
> lenses were sharp and relatively flare free. Indeed, most of the early 
> long focus Leica and Zeiss "telephoto" lenses used for sports and wildlife 
> photography had simple cemented achromat doublets at the end of a long 
> tube. It is possible to get very sharp photos with a simple lens but you 
> have to work at it. It is so much easier today.
> Larry Z
> - - - -
> Alan Magayne-Roshak writes:
> 
> 
> Two taken with an old single-element (approx. f/2.8) magnifying lens 
> mounted in an extension tube.
> 
> 
> Artificial lily in my office:
> &lt;http://gallery.leica-users.org/v/Alan+Magayne-Roshak/Trees/20130726_MR_Mine_30D2037.jpg.html&gt;
> Coneflower in front yard:
> &lt;http://gallery.leica-users.org/v/Alan+Magayne-Roshak/Trees/20130730_MR_Mine_30D2047.jpg.html&gt;
> 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Leica Users Group.
> See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information



In reply to: Message from lrzeitlin at aol.com (lrzeitlin at aol.com) ([Leica] Single element lens)