Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2013/07/02

[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]

Subject: [Leica] Leica love/hate
From: images at comporium.net (Tina Manley)
Date: Tue, 2 Jul 2013 10:43:31 -0400
References: <8D04548B0A4D528-1A60-644BE@webmail-m299.sysops.aol.com>

You think not?

"If you were starting out today, the only way you'd have a Leica is if your
husband bought it for you."

If that's not a sexist remark, I never heard one.

Tina


On Tue, Jul 2, 2013 at 10:36 AM, <lrzeitlin at aol.com> wrote:

>  Chris,
>
>
> Stand your ground. You don't have anything to apologize for. Tell it like
> it ?is.
> Larry Z
> - - -?
> You're letting your emotional attachment to a brand get the best of
> reason. That is not smart. Leica doesn't give a damn about you; they're a
> business, not a church. Being so emotionally invested in your gear just
> gives them justification to continue charging astronomical prices. You're
> a marketer's wet dream.
>
>
>
>
> --?
> Chris Crawford
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Leica Users Group.
> See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information
>
>


-- 
Tina Manley
http://tina-manley.artistwebsites.com


Replies: Reply from imagist3 at mac.com (George Lottermoser) ([Leica] Leica love/hate)
Reply from steve.barbour at gmail.com (Steve Barbour) ([Leica] Leica love/hate)
In reply to: Message from lrzeitlin at aol.com (lrzeitlin at aol.com) ([Leica] Leica love/hate)