Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2013/05/28

[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]

Subject: [Leica] a photographer sued
From: mark at rabinergroup.com (Mark Rabiner)
Date: Tue, 28 May 2013 23:49:11 -0400

I belive legal action is the result of someone being harmed.
You have to prove damages.


On 5/28/13 12:44 AM, "Bill Pearce" <billcpearce at cox.net> wrote:

> Generally in the US, legal action is made in anticipation of money.
> Obviously, no one knows how little money is to be made in fine art
> photography.
> 
> -----Original Message-----
> From: George Lottermoser
> Sent: Monday, May 27, 2013 10:17 PM
> To: Leica Users Group
> Subject: Re: [Leica] a photographer sued
> 
> 
> On May 27, 2013, at 4:07 PM, Lew Schwartz wrote:
> 
>> I'm still not clear on what line is being crossed here. Is it the taking
>> of
>> the photographs or the possibility of making money?
> 
> not sure what "alleged" line is "allegedly" being crossed
> to be determined
> to be continued
> 
> Regards,
> George Lottermoser
> george at imagist.com
> http://www.imagist.com
> http://www.imagist.com/blog
> http://www.linkedin.com/in/imagist
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Leica Users Group.
> See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information
> 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Leica Users Group.
> See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information




-- 
Mark William Rabiner
Photography
http://gallery.leica-users.org/v/lugalrabs/




In reply to: Message from billcpearce at cox.net (Bill Pearce) ([Leica] a photographer sued)