Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2013/05/28

[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]

Subject: [Leica] REASONS why Leica is so slow with M
From: msadat at gmail.com (mehrdad)
Date: Tue, 28 May 2013 08:54:26 -0700
References: <CAE3QcF6C=Tozcs7Qe95rP-B2bhUmXzj6Ag7QBc5RXW4rD-HPTA@mail.gmail.com> <CDC87893.A2E1%mark@rabinergroup.com> <CAE3QcF4329+tqVs+W39u4YMZLCaGeoCBxxWofouHSD6S8YjG5w@mail.gmail.com> <F44F85A9-23E9-4D12-B7C3-55ABA883C637@archiphoto.com> <CAE3QcF6eO01aazx+Gn9ZS0WbNb72=w8+rra0g+kT_e3i8ww1fA@mail.gmail.com> <017601ce5b34$75712760$60537620$@cox.net> <CAE3QcF7Z-Qp9EnBdTNS_6zqQRiEdACi4YcguMhbVR3PB+R+C+Q@mail.gmail.com> <CA+=0raCk_TZLgYgEbfA_3o5RsWF4Zaa0cEnwJ8TwrQa5PnQmWw@mail.gmail.com> <51A4D1A0.6040903@gmx.de>

agreed, i think it has an updated cmos so it shoot video and that it. the
lens is too slow and not enough reach. the ricoh (now discontinued) had a
24-85 lens.


On Tue, May 28, 2013 at 8:47 AM, Douglas Sharp <douglas.sharp at gmx.de> 
wrote:

> Pretty underwhelming!
>
> Douglas
>
>
>
> On 28.05.2013 17:18, mehrdad wrote:
>
>> well looks like i was right! here is the minilux zoom,
>>
>>        http://www.mirrorlessrumors.**com/first-image-of-the-leica-**
>> m-mini/<http://www.mirrorlessrumors.com/first-image-of-the-leica-m-mini/>
>>
>>
>> On Mon, May 27, 2013 at 5:04 PM, Geoff Hopkinson <hopsternew at gmail.com
>> >wrote:
>>
>>  Hi Ken. The M typ 240 has a viewfinder with rf just like an M6 or
>>> whatever
>>> except that the framelines are now llumnated redor white. The lines
>>> themselves are still mechanical. But with the new sensor you ca also use
>>> liveview on the back or through an optional clip on EVF. Olympus make
>>> that
>>> and Leica rebadge it (and charge double for it)! Liveview though adds the
>>> option of additional  options including focus peaking and magnification
>>> (of
>>> centre only)
>>>
>>> ______________________________**_________________
>>> Leica Users Group.
>>> See 
>>> http://leica-users.org/**mailman/listinfo/lug<http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug>for
>>>  more information
>>>
>>>
>>
>>
>
> ______________________________**_________________
> Leica Users Group.
> See 
> http://leica-users.org/**mailman/listinfo/lug<http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug>for
>  more information
>



-- 
  -------------------------------------
  regards, mehrdad


In reply to: Message from hopsternew at gmail.com (Geoff Hopkinson) ([Leica] REASONS why leica is so slow with M)
Message from mark at rabinergroup.com (Mark Rabiner) ([Leica] REASONS why Leica is so slow with M)
Message from hopsternew at gmail.com (Geoff Hopkinson) ([Leica] REASONS why Leica is so slow with M)
Message from henningw at archiphoto.com (Henning Wulff) ([Leica] REASONS why Leica is so slow with M)
Message from hopsternew at gmail.com (Geoff Hopkinson) ([Leica] REASONS why Leica is so slow with M)
Message from kcarney1 at cox.net (Ken Carney) ([Leica] REASONS why Leica is so slow with M)
Message from hopsternew at gmail.com (Geoff Hopkinson) ([Leica] REASONS why Leica is so slow with M)
Message from msadat at gmail.com (mehrdad) ([Leica] REASONS why Leica is so slow with M)
Message from douglas.sharp at gmx.de (Douglas Sharp) ([Leica] REASONS why Leica is so slow with M)