Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2013/05/17

[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]

Subject: [Leica] To tempt Fuji X users?
From: jhnichols at lighttube.net (Jim Nichols)
Date: Fri, 17 May 2013 16:38:51 -0500
References: <18579692.1368826056725.JavaMail.root@elwamui-milano.atl.sa.earthlink.net>

To quote Doug Herr:
>......but grainy/noisy extreme crops made with an old 10MP crop-sensor 
>camera and a 1970->spec lens sell too.

Doug,

You nailed my equipment very nicely.  Guess there is hope for me yet.  ;~))


Jim Nichols
Tullahoma, TN USA
----- Original Message ----- 
From: "Doug Herr" <wildlightphoto at earthlink.net>
To: "Leica Users Group" <lug at leica-users.org>
Sent: Friday, May 17, 2013 4:27 PM
Subject: Re: [Leica] To tempt Fuji X users?


> On May 17, 2013, at 3:31 PM, Mark Rabiner wrote:
>
>> I've been shooting with a full frame DSLR for two and a half years now. 
>> When
>> I look at my metadata I see that my auto iso has me at iso 64,000 for 
>> half
>> of any take I ever do.
>
> I think it's silly to classify any camera as suitable or not suitable for 
> professional work based on isolated performance specifications.  For me 
> the relevant metric is "can I sell the picture?" and based on some recent 
> sales the typical DSLR user is spending way too much money on photo 
> hardwear.
>
> Full-frame, half-frame, APS-C, m4/3, whatever... it hardly matters.  The 
> better quality image will appeal to a broader range of markets (and is 
> more likely to put a smile on my face), but grainy/noisy extreme crops 
> made with an old 10MP crop-sensor camera and a 1970-spec lens sell too.
>
> Doug Herr
> Birdman of Sacramento
> http://www.wildlightphoto.com
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Leica Users Group.
> See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information
>
> 




In reply to: Message from wildlightphoto at earthlink.net (Doug Herr) ([Leica] To tempt Fuji X users?)