Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2013/05/10

[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]

Subject: [Leica] Petition Against Adobe Subscription Model
From: abridge at mac.com (Adam Bridge)
Date: Fri, 10 May 2013 09:29:49 -0700
References: <CAH1UNJ2T02hD9coBZ_TyNsX3d9Cfu75P0c3d6ytkEh1UR95sMA@mail.gmail.com> <00FAFAC6-1C08-49A2-87F9-E9E95D4E9D29@frozenlight.eu> <CAE3QcF6y4-YaF_2sxQPayft5x5NWwpXmf3VSxd6b3waq993Q4w@mail.gmail.com> <CAF8hL-FYKtxptAts0HQVQ61BwJrh3qjtha=xRNnjs-Vkq70LUg@mail.gmail.com> <CAFuU78d-sH1FMG9mkd+Bb6H_OJurxWKs3OrmOocqRudtN0Gfqw@mail.gmail.com> <1368124703.42954.YahooMailNeo@web125003.mail.ne1.yahoo.com>

Well as things stand now you don't need to be connected to the net except at 
the time of a renewal. So you can go 30 days w/o touching the net and still 
work. At least that has been my experience although I've never been off-line 
for longer than a few days at a stretch.

But for someone going on a trip without an internet connection this could 
become an issue.

I think I'll have to do some research.

I have been using CC for about a year now. I use InDesign (page layout), 
Illustrator (design), DreamWeaver (web layout), and Photoshop. I've been 
playing around with AfterEffects for a bit of video work although Final Cut 
X is where I do video for the most part. I'm not a Premiere fan. I have a 
purchased version of LightRoom although I could use the cloud version if I 
wished.

I can see that, in a few years, I might simply need LightRoom and Photoshop 
in which case CC looks like overkill.

It'll be interesting to see how all of this plays out. I don't know the 
economics of graphics design studios or other professional locations with 
many seats. It might be that CC is a good deal for them.

I read a piece on Nash's site that suggested that a version of Photoshop or 
Lightroom might always allow you to open an image, print it, and save it in 
another format allowing work to be retrieved into a non-proprietary format. 

I don't consider DNG as proprietary. 

Adam

On May 9, 2013, at 11:38 AM, R. Clayton McKee <rcmphoto at yahoo.com> wrote:

> If it's not all local, then their line about being able to use it when 
> you're not connected to the Net is a blatant (and actionable) falsehood.
> 
> The only thing that can logically be set on a remote is a verification 
> that the copy is licensed...  and those things have been crackable since 
> probably the second day that the model was released.  
> 
> Personally I have no problem with the new model, and I'm not interested in 
> cracking it (even if I could, which I can't).  I won't be buying in, as 
> there are already several more than adequate alternatives for me, but it's 
> well within Adobe's rights to decide that they don't want people like me 
> (or anyone who asks me) as customers.
> 
> 
>  
> R. Clayton McKee
> PhotoJournalist
> from somewhere just south of somewhere else...



Replies: Reply from charcot at comcast.net (Photo) ([Leica] Petition Against Adobe Subscription Model)
Reply from rcmphoto at yahoo.com (R. Clayton McKee) ([Leica] Petition Against Adobe Subscription Model)
In reply to: Message from jayanand at gmail.com (Jayanand Govindaraj) ([Leica] Petition Against Adobe Subscription Model)
Message from photo at frozenlight.eu (Nathan Wajsman) ([Leica] Petition Against Adobe Subscription Model)
Message from hopsternew at gmail.com (Geoff Hopkinson) ([Leica] Petition Against Adobe Subscription Model)
Message from richard at richardmanphoto.com (Richard Man) ([Leica] Petition Against Adobe Subscription Model)
Message from lew1716 at gmail.com (Lew Schwartz) ([Leica] Petition Against Adobe Subscription Model)
Message from rcmphoto at yahoo.com (R. Clayton McKee) ([Leica] Petition Against Adobe Subscription Model)