Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2013/03/01
[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]If that's the case, I guess Bert Stern would call it the Va-va-va-voom! -Lew Schwartz On Mar 1, 2013 3:47 PM, "Sue Ryan" <scoutfinch at chartermi.net> wrote: > I refer to the Monochrom as the MM, for what's worth.... > > Sue > > Sent from my iPad > > On Mar 1, 2013, at 3:38 PM, Mark Rabiner <mark at rabinergroup.com> wrote: > > > Tina I don't think people will at all be referring to the new Monochrom > as > > the new M very often at all. > > I do think they will refer to the M as the new Leica M and the other half > > the time the new Leica M 250. > > What I want to know is 250 what? Its a 25. > > > > I think we should call it the new Leica M? > > (that's supposed to be a yin yang symbol.) > > > > As this is the first M which is sealed ....(arf!) > > We should call it the Leica M? > > > > > > !! > > > > On 2/28/13 2:34 PM, "Tina Manley" <images at comporium.net> wrote: > > > >> The name is so very confusing! I keep seeing references to the Leica M > and > >> think they are referring to the Monochrom, but it's always the new one! > >> Are we going to call both of them the Leica M? > >> > >> Tina > >> > >> On Thu, Feb 28, 2013 at 2:13 PM, John McMaster <john at mcmaster.co.nz> > wrote: > >> > >>> So a (very) few are out in the wild now.... > >>> > >>> john > >>> > >>> _______________________________________________ > >>> Leica Users Group. > >>> See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information > > > > > > > > > > -- > > Mark William Rabiner > > Photography > > http://gallery.leica-users.org/v/lugalrabs/ > > > > > > > > _______________________________________________ > > Leica Users Group. > > See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information > > _______________________________________________ > Leica Users Group. > See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information