Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2013/02/07

[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]

Subject: [Leica] First official M(240) shots
From: philippe.amard at sfr.fr (philippe.amard)
Date: Thu, 7 Feb 2013 19:57:40 +0100
References: <80F9701439F20347874CE5E4E03C22E9AD2E29FD@WhizzMAIL01.whizz.org> <80F9701439F20347874CE5E4E03C22E9AD2E3385@WhizzMAIL01.whizz.org> <80F9701439F20347874CE5E4E03C22E9AE6A8BCE@WHIZZMAIL02.whizz.org> <04b801ce04f9$f2f05e90$d8d11bb0$@verizon.net> <36950332-AACC-4F6F-8580-B98C99A917D1@sfr.fr> <CAJ3Pgh58GosnCfr5==H=1HeS65Yb4k6jJMK7o6h_RtuGrrnpBg@mail.gmail.com>

???

Paul,

we're dealing with M 744 files, not M9's ....

Ph


Le 7 f?vr. 13 ? 19:50, Paul Roark a ?crit :

> philippe.amard <philippe.amard at sfr.fr> wrote:
>> 6400 displays some banding - bad processing?
>>
>
> The deep shadow look is a major advantage of the M9 over my Canon 5D2.
> I don't have enough experience with CMOS to know if this is just
> Canon or typical of CMOS.  The difference is that the Canon shows a
> pattern when the deep shadows are radically expanded.  The M9 just
> shows more of a heavy grain look; it's much more random and acceptable
> to me.  My concern is that the pattern in the CMOS might be due to the
> way the signal is off-loaded to the processor.  If so, it might be
> typical of those types of chips.  I'll be doing some testing of a Sony
> RX1 soon to see what it's deep shadow performance looks like.
>
> Paul
> www.PaulRoark.com
>
> _______________________________________________
> Leica Users Group.
> See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information

One sees clearly only with the heart. What is essential is invisible  
to the eye. Antoine de Saint Exup?ry in Le Petit Prince.

NO ARCHIVE





In reply to: Message from philippe.amard at sfr.fr (philippe.amard) ([Leica] First official M(240) shots)
Message from roark.paul at gmail.com (Paul Roark) ([Leica] First official M(240) shots)