Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2013/02/14

[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]
Subject: [Leica] FF - NZ roses x2
From: john at mcmaster.co.nz (John McMaster)
Date: Thu, 14 Feb 2013 20:25:58 +0000
References: <80F9701439F20347874CE5E4E03C22E9B0BB26C6@WHIZZMAIL02.whizz.org>, <87B9600F-CDA5-4495-BB29-D633E49D08B4@mac.com>
 
Thanks for looking George, I will take another look at the second when I get 
home...

john
________________________________________


On Feb 14, 2013, at 12:30 PM, John McMaster wrote:

> http://johnmcmaster.com/PESO/Flowers/2013/content/L1009668_large.html
> and
> http://johnmcmaster.com/PESO/Flowers/2013/content/L1009671_large.html

The first struck me as "exceptional"
the second struck me as "a tad dark and/or flat"

Regards,
George Lottermoser
In reply to: Message from john at mcmaster.co.nz (John McMaster) ([Leica] FF - NZ roses x2)
Message from imagist3 at mac.com (George Lottermoser) ([Leica] FF - NZ roses x2)