Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2013/02/03

[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]
Subject: [Leica] Canon doesn't see it quite like Mark
From: frank.dernie at btinternet.com (FRANK DERNIE)
Date: Sun, 3 Feb 2013 17:16:13 +0000 (GMT)
References: <CD3384AC.4AC1%mark@rabinergroup.com> <274A4A71-B37B-43DC-8684-EB1B7A8655F6@mac.com>
 
I bought a "Hansa" Canon many yeras ago, just since I was interested in the 
history and engineering side.
It is -very- poorly made compared to a contemporary Leica but interesting in 
that it really has some unique design features.
Subsequent Japanese Leica copies are far more slavish



>________________________________
> From: George Lottermoser <imagist3 at mac.com>
>To: Leica Users Group <lug at leica-users.org> 
>Sent: Sunday, 3 February 2013, 16:48
>Subject: Re: [Leica] Canon doesn't see it quite like Mark
> 
><http://www.canon.com/camera-museum/history/canon_story/1933_1936/1933_1936.html>
>
>a note off the iPad, George
>
>On Feb 3, 2013, at 2:06 AM, Mark Rabiner <mark at rabinergroup.com> wrote:
>
>> looking
>
>_______________________________________________
>Leica Users Group.
>See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information
>
>
>
In reply to: Message from mark at rabinergroup.com (Mark Rabiner) ([Leica] Canon doesn't see it quite like Mark)
Message from imagist3 at mac.com (George Lottermoser) ([Leica] Canon doesn't see it quite like Mark)