Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2013/02/02
[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]We'll see. I think one or two people who are committed to quality photography might justify financing one or two. And hearing of a compact near pocketable camera with one lens is one thing. But SEEING one is another. It is a drop dead gorgeous piece of merchandise. Here is a shot of one in front of its whole system of I'm counting 25 = pieces. http://www.photographydailynews.com/wp-content/uploads/2012/09/SONY-DSC-RX1. jpg Or http://tinyurl.com/bfpvqvx On 2/3/13 1:54 AM, "Frank Filippone" <red735i at verizon.net> wrote: > Best look at your prices again.... they were at most, several hundred, not > $1K. > Most of the cameras you list date to the 70's...... I own/ed most. > But that is all digression.... > > A $2800 one lens camera is really a camera for the collector or rich > oligarch, not the advanced amateur or pro. > > Again, my opinion. > > Frank Filippone > Red735i at verizon.net > >> Frank I'm used to compact quality cameras costing a grand 20 or 30 >> years ago with a fixed lens as were a lot of people I knew. And the >> list of those cameras I've typed out a few times. >> The Minox 35 GT. Or Minox 35s >> Contax T. Rollei 35m, Olympus XA > > > > _______________________________________________ > Leica Users Group. > See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information -- Mark William Rabiner Photography http://gallery.leica-users.org/v/lugalrabs/