Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2013/01/28

[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]

Subject: [Leica] (Now) Nikon 24-120
From: richard at richardmanphoto.com (Richard Man)
Date: Mon, 28 Jan 2013 02:01:37 -0800
References: <mailman.730.1359328936.89460.lug@leica-users.org> <d8d99b98-6555-4c4c-9fdd-da96bd13878e@store0.postmaster.co.uk> <80F9701439F20347874CE5E4E03C22E9A8C0BAAD@WhizzMAIL01.whizz.org>

The big thing really is the RF focusing. I love it when I tried it with a
rented M6 and never look back, but it's definitely not for every body.


On Mon, Jan 28, 2013 at 1:51 AM, John McMaster <john at mcmaster.co.nz> 
wrote:

> OK, the price has not put you off? You know/like rangefinder focussing?
>
> If you like a limited range of fixed focal length lenses say 28mm to 75mm
> (via 35mm and 50mm) it may work, they exist outside of that range but are
> harder to use.
>
> I sold my D800E as I did not like the images (/lenses) compared to my
> M9....
>
> john
>
> > -----Original Message-----
>
> > Hence the attraction of a 21 oz digital Leica M rangefinder.
> >
> > Needless to say, if anyone has any information or opinion they think
> will be
> > useful, I?d be most grateful.
> >
>
> _______________________________________________
> Leica Users Group.
> See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information
>



-- 
// richard <http://www.richardmanphoto.com>


In reply to: Message from owl at postmaster.co.uk (John Owlett) ([Leica] (Now) Nikon 24-120)
Message from john at mcmaster.co.nz (John McMaster) ([Leica] (Now) Nikon 24-120)