Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2013/01/03
[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]Scala was made by Agfa, not Ilford. But you are right, if correctly exposed it was OK to scan. But it was very unforgiving of underexposure. Cheers, Nathan Nathan Wajsman Alicante, Spain http://www.frozenlight.eu http://www.greatpix.eu PICTURE OF THE WEEK: http://www.fotocycle.dk/paws Blog: http://nathansmusings.wordpress.com/ Sign my petition against the gun lobby: https://petitions.whitehouse.gov/petition/include-nra-list-terrorist-organizations-group-actively-promotes-killing-us-civilians/GgyPdyy4 YNWA On Jan 3, 2013, at 8:55 PM, Dennis Kushner wrote: > Maybe the difference is later scanners & software make it easier today > than what was available back then for desktop use. Scala was very critical > for starting with a good exposure to get best results. The clear film base > used was made for easier scans according to Ilford. I'll have to look for > my > original packet with a promo slide Ilford sent me. > > Another bike shot from the archives. 1997 T-town Velodrome World Cup. > Below is about 50% crop of Scala slide T90 & FD 400/4.5 SSC handheld. > http://gallery.leica-users.org/v/denik22/Velo+1997.jpg.html > C & C welcome. > New Year Cheers, > Dennis > > > On Thu, Jan 3, 2013 at 11:10 AM, Nathan Wajsman <photo at > frozenlight.eu>wrote: > >> I loved Scala in my film days, but I always found it difficult to scan. >> >> Cheers, >> Nathan >> >> > > _______________________________________________ > Leica Users Group. > See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information >