Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2013/01/01

[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]
Subject: [Leica] a "pro-hobbyist" evaluates an M9 . . . ICK
From: john at mcmaster.co.nz (John McMaster)
Date: Tue, 1 Jan 2013 21:23:54 +0000
References: <CD0884E6.2CBB%mark@rabinergroup.com> <B87C31DB15084DD6B2D4BD1CE004A041@billHP>
 
When I scanned in my Hasselblad negs (FP4) taken on SWC/M, 50, 80, 150 C T* 
lenses (my last kit was CF 903 SWC/M, 50, 100, 180) the Superwide ones were 
the only ones which were really sharp at 3200dpi. The others I am quite 
happy to be using the Leica's instead of.

john

> -----Original Message-----
> 
> OOOOOOHHHH. A Superwide. Would really like one, but prices remain as
> high as in film days, don't know why! I'll get one right after a digital 
> Xpan.
> 
> Bill Pearce
>
Replies: Reply from red735i at verizon.net (Frank Filippone) ([Leica] a "pro-hobbyist" evaluates an M9 . . . ICK)
 In reply to: Message from mark at rabinergroup.com (Mark Rabiner) ([Leica] a "pro-hobbyist" evaluates an M9 . . . ICK)
Message from billcpearce at cox.net (Bill Pearce) ([Leica] a "pro-hobbyist" evaluates an M9 . . . ICK)