Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2012/12/29
[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]Yes Richard, it is the content, and I have certainly advocated that position many times. Yet it is disappointing that Leica is unable to give us good high(ish) ISO. Yes, occasionally an image shot at 1250 or 2500 is usable, but just as often it is not. I know that in the film days we were happy with grainy film images at 1600, but the goal posts have moved, and it is utterly frustrating that my Pentax K5 does ISO 6400 far better than any Leica does ISO 2500. Cheers, Nathan Nathan Wajsman Alicante, Spain http://www.frozenlight.eu http://www.greatpix.eu PICTURE OF THE WEEK: http://www.fotocycle.dk/paws Blog: http://nathansmusings.wordpress.com/ Sign my petition against the gun lobby: https://petitions.whitehouse.gov/petition/include-nra-list-terrorist-organizations-group-actively-promotes-killing-us-civilians/GgyPdyy4 YNWA On Dec 30, 2012, at 4:26 AM, Richard Man wrote: > Let the avalanche begins :-)? > > I have two 13x19 prints hanging on my wall now taken ISO 2000. They are in > the 2011 LUG book. Look quite nice. > > For certain photography, it's not the (lack of) noise, it's not the > composition, it's not even the light. It's the content. > > > On Sat, Dec 29, 2012 at 7:11 PM, John McMaster <john at mcmaster.co.nz> > wrote: > >> >> http://www.guardian.co.uk/artanddesign/photography-blog/2012/dec/28/leica-m-e-rangefinder-photography?intcmp=ILCMUSTXT9387 >> >> john >> >> _______________________________________________ >> Leica Users Group. >> See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information >> > > > > -- > // richard <http://www.richardmanphoto.com> > > _______________________________________________ > Leica Users Group. > See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information >