Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2012/12/03

[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]

Subject: [Leica] Professional use and Professionalism
From: mark at rabinergroup.com (Mark Rabiner)
Date: Mon, 03 Dec 2012 15:37:40 -0500

Yep age is a part of it.
Sensors get better. The small ones and the big ones.
The big ones are just as much better than the small ones as before.
Both got better. But the gap reminds between the two formats from similarly
aged sensors.

I've used my D40x from time to time as I had a bad fall and messed up both
my wrists in late October. I plan to get a nice compact light 35mm 1.8 AFS
lens for it as you cant focus manually with it unless its a real wide.
Putting the awesome but not small 12-24 on it which equals 18 to 35 makes
for a nice change to daylight shooting.  I sure did some nice with with that
lens of my cars for the NYTimes. I point the D40x at stuff as I walk at
night and it doesn't even go off. Or if it does its blank on the screen.
The difference between iso 1600 and 6400 is only two stops. But its two big
stops when shooting at night it seems. Stops you need.

Mark William Rabiner
Photography
http://gallery.leica-users.org/v/lugalrabs/


> From: Robert Meier <robertmeier at usjet.net>
> Reply-To: Leica Users Group <lug at leica-users.org>
> Date: Mon, 03 Dec 2012 14:19:03 -0600 (CST)
> To: Leica Users Group <lug at leica-users.org>
> Subject: Re: [Leica] Professional use and Professionalism
> 
> Mark,
> 
> If you haven't used a DX camera since the D40x, then you don't know about 
> what
> Nikon has done with their DX sensors and circuits.
> The current DX cameras, like the D5100 and D7000 (which share the same
> sensor), give results that are significantly better
> than the older generation of DX cameras, and at high ISO's, are very good
> indeed.   Check the dpreview.com comparisons of the D5100
> with the M9, and D4.   You might be surprised.
> 
> If self respect is the reason to get a full frame camera, then something is
> wrong with all the serious photographers using 4/3's and Sony mirrorless
> cameras.
> 
> Robert
> 
> On Dec 3, 2012, at 1:12 PM, Mark Rabiner <mark at rabinergroup.com> wrote:
> 
>> Robert the D5200 a cropped sensor camera. A DX. Its for dads shooting kids
>> opening presents in December.
>> I got the D40x 5 long years ago as a lighter D200 which had as I could not
>> afford a full frame the only nikon options was sky high and because of 
>> that
>> full frame shooting was a Canon thing; I first got my D200 & D40x in 2006
>> and 2007 when half the pros were still using cropped cameras. A year later
>> it was a third and a year after that it was a forth. At the present time 
>> the
>> amount pro work with cropped cameras represents a very small niche of
>> schlock. Even up and coming kid photographers have more self respect than
>> that. They mow more lawns and get the bottom line full frame camera to 
>> shoot
>> the football games it gets dark!
>> 
>> When the Leica M8 came out  14 September 2006 the majority of pros and
>> serious shooters were shooting with cropped digital formats. So it was no
>> big deal. Not its the equivalent of showing up to a job with a Brownie
>> Hawkeye.
>> 
>> Mark William Rabiner
>> Photography
>> http://gallery.leica-users.org/v/lugalrabs/
>> 
>> 
>>> From: Robert Meier <robertmeier at usjet.net>
>>> Reply-To: Leica Users Group <lug at leica-users.org>
>>> Date: Mon, 03 Dec 2012 09:16:51 -0600 (CST)
>>> To: Leica Users Group <lug at leica-users.org>
>>> Subject: Re: [Leica] Professional use and Professionalism
>>> 
>>> You might be thinking of the D3200.   At any rate, the D3200 and the 
>>> D5200,
>>> which isn't available yet, have 24 meg sensors
>>> that are very good.   At the normal range of ISO's you probably can't 
>>> tell
>>> the
>>> difference between the files they produce and
>>> what a full-frame camera produces.   As for the articulated screen, it's 
>>> one
>>> of the most useful features a camera can have,
>>> letting you shoot at waist level inconspicuously.
>>> 
>>> It's the lineal descendant of the D40x that you used so extensively and
>>> touted
>>> so highly.
>>> 
>>> Robert
>>> 
>>> On Dec 3, 2012, at 2:39 AM, Mark Rabiner <mark at rabinergroup.com> 
>>> wrote:
>>> 
>>>> Make a living, Don with a D5200  upper entry level nikon which comes in
>>>> different colors notably red, cost eleven hundred dollars and has a big
>>>> dial
>>>> on top with a flower, a mountain, a skier (maybe its a jogger), a women
>>>> with
>>>> a hat, a kid with its head cracked open, a big word in caps: EFFECTS or
>>>> SCENE.  Has a cropped sensor and a back screen which flops out to the 
>>>> side
>>>> idiotically.
>>>> Its an insult to your client and to yourself.
>>>> And basically on this list its one more insult to the profession of
>>>> photography. The only thing its not is an insult to the Leica company.
>>>> You want to join a profession you do it right.
>>>> 
>>>> 
http://content.hwigroup.net/images/products/xl/166270/3/nikon_d5200_body.jp>>>>
g
>>>> or
>>>> http://tinyurl.com/cchms4u
>>>> 
>>>> If you used it to shoot a wedding half the wedding party would be 
>>>> shooting
>>>> with a better camera than you are.
>>>> 
>>>> 
>>>> Mark William Rabiner
>>>> Photography
>>>> http://gallery.leica-users.org/v/lugalrabs/
>>>> 
>>>> 
>>>>> From: Robert Meier <robertmeier at usjet.net>
>>>>> Reply-To: Leica Users Group <lug at leica-users.org>
>>>>> Date: Sun, 02 Dec 2012 20:15:45 -0600 (CST)
>>>>> To: Leica Users Group <lug at leica-users.org>
>>>>> Subject: Re: [Leica] Professional use and Professionalism
>>>>> 
>>>>> Except that the D5200 isn't available for sale yet.
>>>>> 
>>>>> 
>>>>> On Dec 2, 2012, at 7:20 PM, Don Dory <don.dory at gmail.com> wrote:
>>>>> 
>>>>>> I have read with great interest the thread on professional cameras and
>>>>>> the
>>>>>> failings of Leica.
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> My only real point is that if you are getting paid you have back ups 
>>>>>> to
>>>>>> your back up.  If you can't afford two or three identical bodies then 
>>>>>> you
>>>>>> rotate into newer stuff before your current tool is too far gone to be
>>>>>> dependable.  Same with lenses, power, flashes, and memory storage.  
>>>>>> All
>>>>>> things fail when you need them so there has to be a next.
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> My second observation is that all brands fail, all lenses have issues,
>>>>>> and
>>>>>> sensors from every vendor can do some very interesting things.  This 
>>>>>> is
>>>>>> from direct observation from handling thousands(yes thousands) of
>>>>>> cameras,
>>>>>> lenses, flashes and what have you.
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> Last, the worst thing you can do is not use your equipment.  I see 
>>>>>> more
>>>>>> really nice outside with fuzzy, stiff, non working insides because
>>>>>> someone
>>>>>> put the item away in deep storage and didn't make such good choices 
>>>>>> as to
>>>>>> what that storage might be.
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> Use the tool that you can afford that gets the job done.  Believe me,
>>>>>> I've
>>>>>> gone down many rabbit holes searching for the best: knife, 1911, fast
>>>>>> burning powder, 50mm lens, 35mm lens, framing hammer....My conclusion 
>>>>>> is
>>>>>> that most of the time any of the top three manufacturer's in any given
>>>>>> field will have a perfectly adequate choice starting in the low 
>>>>>> middle of
>>>>>> their line.  In Nikon you could make a living with a D5200 if you were
>>>>>> down
>>>>>> to that.
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> -- 
>>>>>> Don
>>>>>> don.dory at gmail.com
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>>>> Leica Users Group.
>>>>>> See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information
>>>>> 
>>>>> 
>>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>>> Leica Users Group.
>>>>> See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information
>>>> 
>>>> 
>>>> 
>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>> Leica Users Group.
>>>> See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information
>>> 
>>> 
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> Leica Users Group.
>>> See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> _______________________________________________
>> Leica Users Group.
>> See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information
> 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Leica Users Group.
> See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information




In reply to: Message from robertmeier at usjet.net (Robert Meier) ([Leica] Professional use and Professionalism)