Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2012/12/02

[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]

Subject: [Leica] Professional use and Professionalism
From: don.dory at gmail.com (Don Dory)
Date: Sun, 2 Dec 2012 20:20:22 -0500

I have read with great interest the thread on professional cameras and the
failings of Leica.

My only real point is that if you are getting paid you have back ups to
your back up.  If you can't afford two or three identical bodies then you
rotate into newer stuff before your current tool is too far gone to be
dependable.  Same with lenses, power, flashes, and memory storage.  All
things fail when you need them so there has to be a next.

My second observation is that all brands fail, all lenses have issues, and
sensors from every vendor can do some very interesting things.  This is
from direct observation from handling thousands(yes thousands) of cameras,
lenses, flashes and what have you.

Last, the worst thing you can do is not use your equipment.  I see more
really nice outside with fuzzy, stiff, non working insides because someone
put the item away in deep storage and didn't make such good choices as to
what that storage might be.

Use the tool that you can afford that gets the job done.  Believe me, I've
gone down many rabbit holes searching for the best: knife, 1911, fast
burning powder, 50mm lens, 35mm lens, framing hammer....My conclusion is
that most of the time any of the top three manufacturer's in any given
field will have a perfectly adequate choice starting in the low middle of
their line.  In Nikon you could make a living with a D5200 if you were down
to that.

-- 
Don
don.dory at gmail.com


Replies: Reply from mark at rabinergroup.com (Mark Rabiner) ([Leica] Professional use and Professionalism)
Reply from robertmeier at usjet.net (Robert Meier) ([Leica] Professional use and Professionalism)