Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2012/11/27

[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]

Subject: [Leica] Fuji X 100 versus Leica M9
From: jayanand at gmail.com (Jayanand Govindaraj)
Date: Tue, 27 Nov 2012 14:14:13 +0530
References: <BE0EE73A-8358-4257-84B5-FC4CFEA8D820@yahoo.com.sg>

David,
I have also zeroed in on the same two systems...
Cheers
Jayanand

On Tue, Nov 27, 2012 at 8:33 AM, David Ching <davidhhching1 at 
yahoo.com.sg>wrote:

> The DXO lab rates the sensor of the X100 higher than the M9. While many
> will claim that it's the user experience that counts, in terms of value for
> money, one cannot dispute that given that the Fuij comes with a lens too at
> a price less than a used 50mm Summicron pre-ASPH, the Fuji wins hands down.
>
> And why should a full sensor like the RX1 be any better than a smaller
> sensor, example the X100 if the final outcome of the shots are great? Maybe
> the DOF may be a factor..
> Again the user factor differs between these two cameras.
>
> Personally I have used all 3 makes. As usual each has its merits and
> idiosyncrasies. Enjoy them for what they are.
>
> However should I have to make a call, I'd use my Fuji X Pro 1 with the
> superb 35mm for the "rangefinder" experience and my Nikon D800E for faster
> action and professional work.
>
> Best wishes from the East,
>
> David Ching
>
> H.P. Tel. no.: +84 904684321 (Vietnam)
>                     : +65 92321098 (Singapore)
>
> _______________________________________________
> Leica Users Group.
> See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information
>


Replies: Reply from photo at frozenlight.eu (Nathan Wajsman) ([Leica] Fuji X 100 versus Leica M9)
In reply to: Message from davidhhching1 at yahoo.com.sg (David Ching) ([Leica] Fuji X 100 versus Leica M9)