Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2012/11/03

[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]

Subject: [Leica] NZ PAW 44 - Barney
From: philippe.amard at sfr.fr (philippe.amard)
Date: Sat, 3 Nov 2012 23:41:29 +0100
References: <80F9701439F20347874CE5E4E03C22E99C991606@WHIZZMAIL02.whizz.org> <F973ECD4-7F1E-4250-A1A7-DF236C424789@sfr.fr> <80F9701439F20347874CE5E4E03C22E99C9987C6@WHIZZMAIL02.whizz.org> <824E9B36-9319-463F-98E5-3BACBFACE065@embarqmail.com> <80F9701439F20347874CE5E4E03C22E99C998A35@WHIZZMAIL02.whizz.org> <61122DD7-88DC-42C4-9506-AE727E85EA79@mac.com>

Barney,

John's abstract subjects usually don't move, so there shouldn't be any  
problem with switching lenses and the resulting "loss" of time IMHO
But I might be wrong.
Amiti?s
Philippe
Le 3 nov. 12 ? 23:36, Bernard Quinn a ?crit :

>
> I think that there is a lot to be said for your opinion. I find that  
> the more stuff I have with me the more time spend switching lenses  
> and futzing around with this and that and the less time I spend  
> shooting.
>
> Barney
>
> Barney Quinn, WK3Z
> C: (301) 775-1386
> H: (301) 654-0938
>
> On Nov 3, 2012, at 4:35 PM, John McMaster <john at mcmaster.co.nz> wrote:
>
>> I am usually out in local neighbourhood with a single lens (mostly  
>> between 28mm and 75mm), it makes me think and look for shots to  
>> take and I move around until things work. I know you can do that  
>> with a zoom but IMO most people don't ;-)
>>
>> I guess it reduces my options (other than lens speed) and, on  
>> familiar ground, I do not see that as a bad thing. Of course when I  
>> was away recently I had two cameras and six lenses with me much of  
>> the time, but the bulk of my images were MM/50mm and M9/28mm...
>>
>> This is not the same as professional work where you must get a shot  
>> so the versatility of a zoom is required, there again I am not  
>> really one for AF either, my D800E has not had an autofocus lens on  
>> it yet!
>>
>> john
>>
>> -----Original Message-----
>> From: lug-bounces+john=chiaroscuro.co.nz at leica-users.org 
>> [mailto:lug-bounces+john=chiaroscuro.co.nz at leica-users.org 
>> ] On Behalf Of Ric Carter
>> Sent: Sunday, 4 November 2012 9:10 a.m.
>> To: Leica Users Group
>> Subject: Re: [Leica] NZ PAW 44
>>
>> i don't disagree, but am curious as to why
>>
>> ric
>>
>>
>> On Nov 3, 2012, at 3:58 PM, John McMaster <john at mcmaster.co.nz>  
>> wrote:
>>
>>> I much prefer discrete focal lengths (28/35/50 this week) to  
>>> zooms ;-)
>>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> Leica Users Group.
>> See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information
>
> _______________________________________________
> Leica Users Group.
> See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information


Replies: Reply from john at mcmaster.co.nz (John McMaster) ([Leica] NZ PAW 44 - Barney)
In reply to: Message from john at mcmaster.co.nz (John McMaster) ([Leica] NZ PAW 44)
Message from philippe.amard at sfr.fr (philippe.amard) ([Leica] NZ PAW 44)
Message from john at mcmaster.co.nz (John McMaster) ([Leica] NZ PAW 44)
Message from ricc at embarqmail.com (Ric Carter) ([Leica] NZ PAW 44)
Message from john at mcmaster.co.nz (John McMaster) ([Leica] NZ PAW 44)
Message from bjq1 at mac.com (Bernard Quinn) ([Leica] NZ PAW 44)