Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2012/09/26

[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]

Subject: [Leica] Software correection of abberations on MFT systems
From: ricc at embarqmail.com (Ric Carter)
Date: Wed, 26 Sep 2012 13:59:03 -0400
References: <B48C4AE65ECF42FDB5ACDDA670CA7570@qck8vqhgou8blu> <1348679221.22530.YahooMailNeo@web87401.mail.ir2.yahoo.com>

is this perhaps a place lightroom can really make a real power play by 
supplying the corrections for non-corrected lenses in post processing?

ric

On Sep 26, 2012, at 1:07 PM, FRANK DERNIE <frank.dernie at btinternet.com> 
wrote:

> The 4/3 lenses, sensibly IMHO, sacrifice easily digitally corrected 
> parameters for size and sharpness. Since there is no non-digital (ie film) 
> body on which to mount them this seems a no-brainer to me.
> Lenses designed for film never had this option, so will be as good as they 
> ever will be immediately.
> I only shoot raw, and have not noticed a problem with my 20mm f1.7 
> Panasonic on my Olympus OM-D as displayed in either Lightroom or Aperture.
> I have not used my 14-140 Panasonic on it yet.
> I have had super results using a Voigtlander APO 180mm f4 lens on it, but 
> this is a lens designed for film and is superb anyway.
> 
> 
> 
>> ________________________________
>> From: A. Lal <alal at poly.edu>
>> To: Leica Users Group <lug at leica-users.org> 
>> Sent: Wednesday, 26 September 2012, 16:22
>> Subject: [Leica] Software  correection of abberations on MFT systems
>> 
>> LUgers may recall some months ago I posted to this list a question about 
>> using non-makers'  lenses on the micro four thirds system. Specifically, 
>> I was interested to know how an Olympus body would handle a Panasonic 
>> lens and vice versa.
>> 
>> Well the answer, disappointingly, according to the review of the 
>> Panasonic 12-35/2.8 zoom on photozone is that software corrections do not 
>> work with non-makers' lenses. While a Panasonic body will correct the 
>> 12-35 lens' significant distortions and chromatic aberrations, an Olympus 
>> body will not. This leads to the obvious question of how third party 
>> lenses will be handled by MFT bodies. Apparently software will be needed 
>> to correct for optical defects. The 12-35 Panasonic zoom is pretty poor 
>> in terms of distortion and chromatic aberrations and is very likely 
>> typical of upper consumer- grade lenses in today's marketplace. Make 'em 
>> cheap 'n cheerful to keep margins up, correct in software seems to be the 
>> way forward for the big MFT manufacturers.
>> 
>> The review is here:
>> 
>> http://www.photozone.de/m43/766_pana1235f28
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> _______________________________________________
>> Leica Users Group.
>> See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information
>> 
>> 
>> 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Leica Users Group.
> See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information



In reply to: Message from alal at poly.edu (A. Lal) ([Leica] Software correection of abberations on MFT systems)
Message from frank.dernie at btinternet.com (FRANK DERNIE) ([Leica] Software correection of abberations on MFT systems)