Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2012/09/25
[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]I would hope the 18 would be better than a wide range ultra wide zoom as the CZ people are not total idiots and I think the lens does cost more than twenty bucks. Mark William Rabiner Photography http://gallery.leica-users.org/v/lugalrabs/ > From: Akhil Lal <alal at poly.edu> > Reply-To: Leica Users Group <lug at leica-users.org> > Date: Tue, 25 Sep 2012 14:42:04 -0400 > To: Leica Users Group <lug at leica-users.org> > Subject: Re: [Leica] nikon zeiss lens comparison > > On-line tests suggest that the CZ 18mm and 21mm WA primes top the 14-24 > optically. Interestingly, the Nikkor zoom costs about the same as each CZ > prime. > AS an example see: > > Photozone.de > > > > > ----- Original Message ----- > From: "John McMaster" <john at mcmaster.co.nz> > To: "Leica Users Group" <lug at leica-users.org> > Sent: Tuesday, September 25, 2012 2:34 PM > Subject: Re: [Leica] nikon zeiss lens comparison > > >> Look on getdpi.com, a few people who have/had both...... >> >> For quality the Zeiss I think. >> >> john >> ________________________________________ >> >> >> HI All, >> >> Can anyone offer comments based on experience, comparing a Zeiss 18 to a >> Nikon 14-24? >> >> >> Leo Wesson >> >> Mail was checked for spam by the Freeware Edition of CleanMail. >> The Freeware Edition is free for personal and non-commercial use. >> You can remove this notice by purchasing a full license! >> >> _______________________________________________ >> Leica Users Group. >> See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information >> > > > _______________________________________________ > Leica Users Group. > See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information