Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2012/09/19

[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]

Subject: [Leica] New M
From: mark at rabinergroup.com (Mark Rabiner)
Date: Wed, 19 Sep 2012 18:34:35 -0400

We just saw the guy shooting an 80-200 zoom on an M.
Though stabilization at 90mm is not such a bad idea it is a tele lens and
that was everyone's first thought on the problem stabilization can solve.
And saw a pix of an 180 on one.
Why not way long? There's not much I'm not willing to believe anymore.

Mark William Rabiner
Photography
http://gallery.leica-users.org/v/lugalrabs/


> From: Doug Herr <wildlightphoto at earthlink.net>
> Reply-To: Leica Users Group <lug at leica-users.org>
> Date: Wed, 19 Sep 2012 04:24:52 -0700 (GMT-07:00)
> To: Leica Users Group <lug at leica-users.org>
> Subject: Re: [Leica] New M
> 
> Jayanand Govindaraj wrote:
> 
>> Stabilization is probably of limited use on a camera system which is at 
>> its
>> most potent between 15mm and 90mm.....
> 
> With live view and the EVF the camera's usefulness goes well beyond 90mm.
> 
> Doug Herr
> Birdman of Sacramento
> http://www.wildlightphoto.com
> 
> 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Leica Users Group.
> See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information




Replies: Reply from vick.ko at sympatico.ca (Vick Ko) ([Leica] New M)
In reply to: Message from wildlightphoto at earthlink.net (Doug Herr) ([Leica] New M)