Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2012/07/21

[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]

Subject: [Leica] Some technical speculations re: rangefinder
From: richard at richardmanphoto.com (Richard Man)
Date: Sat, 21 Jul 2012 01:07:53 -0700
References: <CAF8hL-EMSebH=YGfXU=qpuVyMbZxGjfH9cebK-BNVAS6oCMMkQ@mail.gmail.com> <CAE3QcF7fytE_9b=DwY0SRKLJtZK6NaqY=KeB3Xj_ZThAmJPNAA@mail.gmail.com>

Well, lets ask it this way, assuming money is not an issue, would you
rather have a CMOS/liveview system, or something like what I wrote?

On Sat, Jul 21, 2012 at 12:45 AM, Geoff Hopkinson <hopsternew at 
gmail.com>wrote:

> When you design it, I'm sure that Leica Camera will take a look;-)
>  For now just swallow a teaspoon of concrete and .....
> ;-) ;-)
>
> Cheers,
> Geoff
> http://www.pbase.com/hoppyman
>
>
>
> On 21 July 2012 17:05, Richard Man <richard at richardmanphoto.com> wrote:
>
> > Speculating on an ideal optical rangefinder system (i.e. something that
> > retains the Leica M DNA and yet improves on the 1950 state of the art
> M3),
> > what if a rangefinder has the following features:
> >
> > - LED projected framelines. This removes the clutter, solves the
> visibility
> > issue, and
> >
> > - changeable rangefinder magnification - what if the rangefinder has
> 0.58x
> > to 1.2x mag builtin (may be in 4 steps: 0.58x, 0.72x, 0.9x and 1.2x or
> > something similar)? This would allow more precise focusing from the wide
> to
> > tele. This will leverage the existing frame line trigger and 6 bit coding
> > system of course so this would be automatic
> >
> > - parallax adjustment based on focusing distance
> >
> > We know LED framelines can be done. The M9 Titanium has it.
> >
> > The XPan has 2 magnifications: one for the 45mm lens and one for the 90mm
> > lens. I have no idea how difficult it is to insert multiple mag piece as
> > needed. Anyone knows?
> >
> > The cam position should also give good indication of the focusing
> distance
> > too, along with the lens info, so #3 is technically feasible too.
> >
> > Chances are Leica nor anyone else would really spend the resource to
> > develop something like these, since a CMOS/Liveview is so much "simpler,"
> > but would it be nice to have such a system?
> >
> > --
> > // richard <http://www.richardmanphoto.com>
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > Leica Users Group.
> > See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information
> >
>
> _______________________________________________
> Leica Users Group.
> See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information
>



-- 
// richard <http://www.richardmanphoto.com>


Replies: Reply from hopsternew at gmail.com (Geoff Hopkinson) ([Leica] Some technical speculations re: rangefinder)
In reply to: Message from richard at richardmanphoto.com (Richard Man) ([Leica] Some technical speculations re: rangefinder)
Message from hopsternew at gmail.com (Geoff Hopkinson) ([Leica] Some technical speculations re: rangefinder)