Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2012/06/17

[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]

Subject: [Leica] OT: Are we Anal or what? "The Puddle Jumper" / Re: How about this one?
From: digiratidoc at gmail.com (James Laird)
Date: Sun, 17 Jun 2012 15:42:33 -0500
References: <CAMGHw9B=aWixmXOd4ESpQ3JEeNkKXZmpuCKStbxTSdMk7-vuHw@mail.gmail.com> <CAF8hL-EpYuzLX+e37HiX-8VQxmgq3cfeEuAY9OPC1bTWonTMsA@mail.gmail.com>

Seemed to have touched a nerve here?  :)

Jim Laird

On Jun 17, 2012, at 3:30 PM, Richard Man <richard at richardmanphoto.com> 
wrote:

> Jim, did you get off the wrong side of the bed, or are you just upset that
> B&D did not ship you the OM-D? :-)
> 
> It's simply a matter of academic curiosity.
> 
> I for one, care very much "the story of the shot." Not that knowing it will
> necessarily help me in my photography, but simply that they are interesting
> things to know.
> 
> If you want to see some of my photos, regardless of gears, please take a
> look at http://richardmanphoto.com - which actually does not mention any
> gear, except in my blog postings.
> 
> 
> On Sun, Jun 17, 2012 at 1:24 PM, James Laird <digiratidoc at gmail.com> 
> wrote:
> 
>> Really? We are worried about whether or not the 'Iwo Jima' shot or the
>> HCB 'Puddle Jumper' shot was staged? Really? Are we worried that maybe
>> the eyelashes on the guy in the puddle jumper shot might be sharper if
>> we shot them with a Nikon D800 vs D800E? Really? Doesn't this seem a
>> bit ridiculous to all of you? Maybe a bit anal?
>> WHO CARES? They are great photographs. Who cares if they were shot
>> with an M4 and a 50mm Collapsible Summicron or an 800E with a Nikkor
>> 50 1.4? It's STILL a great photograph, isn't it? I've seen great
>> photographs taken with 3.2 MP Minolta cameras that most of us would
>> consider pieces of crap, but the photo...a work of art. Beautiful by
>> anyone's standards.
>> I think we all need to take a deep breath, slow down, and realize once
>> and for all that the photograph is what counts. NOT the camera or the
>> lens or the film or the memory card or CS5 or LR4 or whatever we used
>> to get it. A great photograph stands on its own merit. And we all know
>> that the minute we see it. That's what keeps us shooting. We all think
>> that someday we might be skilled enough or (in the end) lucky enough
>> to be in the right place at the right time with a camera to take a
>> photograph that is eternal. Like HCB. He took thousands of
>> photographs, many of which were probably NOT keepers. But he kept on
>> shooting because he was rich enough or lucky enough to be able to do
>> nothing but take photographs, to do the thing that we all love so
>> much. God, he makes me so jealous sometimes. We all probably wish we
>> could have the chance to do what he did.
>> But most of us can't so we think if we buy X lens and Y camera with Z
>> processor/computer that maybe we can do what he did, oh god if we only
>> could. Really?
>> 
>> Just my humble opinion ;)
>> 
>> Jim Laird
>> 
>> _______________________________________________
>> Leica Users Group.
>> See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information
>> 
> 
> 
> 
> -- 
> // richard <http://www.richardmanphoto.com>
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Leica Users Group.
> See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information


Replies: Reply from richard at richardmanphoto.com (Richard Man) ([Leica] OT: Are we Anal or what? "The Puddle Jumper" / Re: How about this one?)
In reply to: Message from digiratidoc at gmail.com (James Laird) ([Leica] OT: Are we Anal or what? "The Puddle Jumper" / Re: How about this one?)
Message from richard at richardmanphoto.com (Richard Man) ([Leica] OT: Are we Anal or what? "The Puddle Jumper" / Re: How about this one?)