Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2012/05/30

[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]

Subject: [Leica] IMG: Family Portrait
From: benedenia at gmail.com (Marty Deveney)
Date: Thu, 31 May 2012 14:28:06 +0930
References: <CA+yJO1BokwLDNQt16a3OQ75oy0bq=fyKys9YNtOU_S-ZHQNnLA@mail.gmail.com> <CABmfTOWbR2SCnyxjTDBsROMA6Dm-AA8B7wmAC=dZvLRLVGGRFg@mail.gmail.com> <CAMGHw9BpTFE6YuifjC5POhfmav3UULYukcBV-hTgemYDu0QP+Q@mail.gmail.com>

Do you mean Mike Disfarmer?
http://www.disfarmer.com/
His work is outstanding.

Marty

On Thu, May 31, 2012 at 2:11 PM, James Laird <digiratidoc at gmail.com> 
wrote:
> Tina,
>
> I remember an amazing early 20th century portrait photographer that
> was profiled in the 70s or 80s in Pop Photo I think and later other
> venues, but his name escapes me. He was totally unrecognized in his
> lifetime until someone found a cache of his photographs on glass
> plates, I think in an attic somewhere. He took only direct, unstaged
> single or family portraits for years of the people who came into his
> shop, from all walks of life, in all manner of attire. He was
> obviously trying to 'document', as much as he could, the populace of
> the area where he lived. And maybe to make a living from it if he
> could. If anyone knows what his name was let me know
> .
> But I do remember that in all his portraits, which was all he took or
> he destroyed the ones that weren't, NONE of his subjects was smiling.
> They exhibited stiff, almost stilted poses in nearly every photograph,
> many of which are absolutely great portraits. They obviously were once
> in a lifetime portraits for most of the subjects, and when sitting (or
> mostly standing if I remember correctly) for the portraits they were
> 'all business'.
>
> I think your 'village people' probably have the same attitude about
> having their family portraits taken. All business. But happy to have
> it done, again as probably a once in a lifetime opportunity. Great
> work you're doing, and I'm sure they all appreciate your efforts more
> than you think. So do we. Keep it up.
>
> Jim Laird
>
> On Wed, May 30, 2012 at 9:50 PM, Marty Deveney <benedenia at gmail.com> 
> wrote:
>> I think this kind of photo is great, and I can see that they may get
>> used editorially too.
>>
>> Marty
>>
>> On Thu, May 31, 2012 at 12:13 PM, Tina Manley <images at comporium.net> 
>> wrote:
>>> PESO:
>>>
>>> I took a similar portrait for all of the families that I stayed with in
>>> Central America. ?It was considered a very serious occasion, not a time 
>>> for
>>> smiles, and everybody posed carefully for the portrait. ?These are the 
>>> ones
>>> that are most valued when I take them back to the families.
>>>
>>> http://www.pbase.com/tinamanley/image/143677832
>>>
>>> Are they of interest to anybody except the families? ?Should I include
>>> these photos in my archives or are they strictly of personal interest to
>>> the families involved? ?I don't generally like posed photos but maybe 
>>> they
>>> are good records of the time and people?
>>>
>>> TIA for your comments and thoughts.
>>>
>>> Tina
>>>
>>> --
>>> Tina Manley, ASMPktly
>>> www.tinamanley.com
>>>
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> Leica Users Group.
>>> See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> Leica Users Group.
>> See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information
>
> _______________________________________________
> Leica Users Group.
> See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information


Replies: Reply from digiratidoc at gmail.com (James Laird) ([Leica] IMG: Family Portrait)
Reply from digiratidoc at gmail.com (James Laird) ([Leica] IMG: Family Portrait)
In reply to: Message from images at comporium.net (Tina Manley) ([Leica] IMG: Family Portrait)
Message from benedenia at gmail.com (Marty Deveney) ([Leica] IMG: Family Portrait)
Message from digiratidoc at gmail.com (James Laird) ([Leica] IMG: Family Portrait)