Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2012/05/26

[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]

Subject: [Leica] IMG: FF +
From: rgacpa at gmail.com (Robert Adler)
Date: Sat, 26 May 2012 07:35:12 -0700
References: <CAAsXt4OnSRAEfEaFZYhKp55UjMQohGJwc1M7qWNov8mERsfQiw@mail.gmail.com> <004301cd3af2$19107ce0$4b3176a0$@chiaroscuro.co.nz> <B9C33773-401F-4ED1-8F20-4F789CB87218@gmail.com> <004401cd3af5$842024b0$8c606e10$@chiaroscuro.co.nz> <28CFA2B5-E6A7-4ECE-9A86-F3EC09BEC2ED@gmail.com> <CABmfTOWkxGzDHj6yENueMbzbmy9uLSdna0hdK_FfzTGdqshzQg@mail.gmail.com>

bummer

On Sat, May 26, 2012 at 1:00 AM, Marty Deveney <benedenia at gmail.com> 
wrote:

> On Sat, May 26, 2012 at 2:01 PM, Bob Adler <rgacpa at gmail.com> wrote:
> > Not fun...
> > It will be very interesting to learn if the increased resolution of the
> MM causes a slew of owners to recalibrate...
>
> I am strongly of the opinion that *any* fast pre-digital Leica M glass
> _must_ be focus calibrated to be useable wide open on an M8, 9, MM etc
> - *any* digital Leica.  The tolerances required to focus accurately on
> a sensor are tighter and Leica developed methods to meet them.
>
> Newer glass is less likely to need this, but I have also noticed that
> with use everything wanders and needs periodic re-calibration.  I send
> everything off every ~2 years, or else if my periodic checks show
> something has changed.
>
> Marty
>
>
> > Good luck John.
> >
> > Sent via iiiPad
> > Bob Adler
> > Redwood City, CA
> >
> > On May 25, 2012, at 9:10 PM, "John McMaster" <john at chiaroscuro.co.nz>
> wrote:
> >
> >> Just the second, so far.... Was way off back focussing when bought,
> 6-bit
> >> and calibration in Solms and now gone to someone in NZ. My 75mm
> Summilux has
> >> been back at Solms for four weeks so far (still back focussing after
> >> 6-bit/factory calibration) so trying a local calibration...
> >>
> >> john
> >>
> >> -----Original Message-----
> >>
> >> Is this the 3rd time?
> >>
> >> Sent via iiiPad
> >> Bob Adler
> >> Redwood City, CA
> >>
> >> On May 25, 2012, at 8:46 PM, "John McMaster" <john at chiaroscuro.co.nz>
> wrote:
> >>
> >>> Certainly looks good on the cat shot, mine was front focussing after
> >>> its trip to Solms so has been sent off again :-(
> >>>
> >>> john
> >>>
> >>> -----Original Message-----
> >>>
> >>> Finally a few minutes to play with the recently calibrated nocti:
> >>>
> >>>> From our garden:
> >>> http://gallery.leica-users.org/v/rgacpa_HI/20120525-L1000656.jpg.html
> >>>
> >>> Millie is back with her unique world view and attitude:
> >>> http://gallery.leica-users.org/v/rgacpa_HI/20120525-L1000646.jpg.html
> >>>
> >>> Seems to be well calibrated. Hope you enjoy, Bob
> >>>
> >>> --
> >>> Bob Adler
> >>>
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >> _______________________________________________
> >> Leica Users Group.
> >> See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > Leica Users Group.
> > See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information
>
> _______________________________________________
> Leica Users Group.
> See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information
>



-- 
Bob Adler
Redwood City, CA
http://www.rgaphoto.com


In reply to: Message from rgacpa at gmail.com (Robert Adler) ([Leica] IMG: FF +)
Message from john at chiaroscuro.co.nz (John McMaster) ([Leica] IMG: FF +)
Message from rgacpa at gmail.com (Bob Adler) ([Leica] IMG: FF +)
Message from john at chiaroscuro.co.nz (John McMaster) ([Leica] IMG: FF +)
Message from rgacpa at gmail.com (Bob Adler) ([Leica] IMG: FF +)
Message from benedenia at gmail.com (Marty Deveney) ([Leica] IMG: FF +)