Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2012/05/08

[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]

Subject: [Leica] Grand Canyon - M9 or XPan?
From: curtisbliss at yahoo.com (CB)
Date: Tue, 8 May 2012 11:37:40 -0700 (PDT)
References: <CAF8hL-EUXc2QQC+UUOmbUHB0YX4J1WbYkiEHMJTMXhkqN61Fhw@mail.gmail.com> <7A0187A89A2941B0AA7C498EE6F24468@syneticfeba505> <CAJj7xs_Y2-43BRvTQ+4wgDnwKbWpXpAXk9++j8eiLuN4Fu458Q@mail.gmail.com> <4FA968BE.7030400@comcast.net>

Go out before dawn with a tripod and whatever you can stuff into a 
backpack!? :-)? 


From: charcot <charcot at comcast.net>
To: Leica Users Group <lug at leica-users.org> 
Sent: Tuesday, May 8, 2012 1:41 PM
Subject: Re: [Leica] Grand Canyon - M9 or XPan?

? I will take the opposite approach - go lite.? And I'd probably shoot 
C41 color film in the Xpan - the canyon can be very contrasty so slide 
film would be a problem.

ernie
On 5/8/2012 11:22 AM, Dennis Kushner wrote:
> Take both. They don't weigh that much to carry around.
> You'll need both as per Dr. Ted.
>
>
> On Tue, May 8, 2012 at 11:24 AM,<tedgrant at shaw.ca>? wrote:
>
>> Richard,
>>
>> They are not 4x5 Speed Gaphics............ TAKE BOTH OR YOU WILL REGRET IT
>> FOR EVER AND EVER!
>>
>> good luck!
>> cheers,
>> Dr. ted
>> TRUST ME!? MY COMMENT IS PURELY FROM YEARS? and YEARS OF EXPERIENCE!!!!!!!
>> In similar situations. If you don't take both you will hate yourself with
>> doubt for the rest of your photographic days! :-)
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> ----- Original Message ----- From: "Richard Man"<
>> richard at richardmanphoto.com>
>>
>> To: "Leica Users Group"<lug at leica-users.org>
>> Sent: Tuesday, May 08, 2012 3:25 AM
>>
>> Subject: [Leica] Grand Canyon - M9 or XPan?
>>
>>
>>? OK, the plan is then for me to get to Grand Canyon South Rim ~10AM Wed. I
>>> plan to do a dayhike, obviously not all the way down.
>>>
>>> I have been there once but only went down a few hundred feet. I am
>>> somewhat
>>> torn between the M9 or the XPan. I have similar lens for both systems, so
>>> the choice really comes down to the convenience of digital versus the
>>> dynamic range of Acros100/TX and the wider view of the XPan. Taking both
>>> is
>>> probably foolish as I will need as much space for water+food.
>>>
>>> Advice? I am leaning toward the XPan...
>>>
>>> --
>>> // 
>>> richard<http://www.richardmanphoto.**com<http://www.richardmanphoto.com>
>>> ______________________________**_________________
>>> Leica Users Group.
>>> See 
>>> http://leica-users.org/**mailman/listinfo/lug<http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug>for
>>>  more information
>>>
>>
>> ______________________________**_________________
>> Leica Users Group.
>> See 
>> http://leica-users.org/**mailman/listinfo/lug<http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug>for
>>  more information
>>
> _______________________________________________
> Leica Users Group.
> See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information
>


_______________________________________________
Leica Users Group.
See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information


In reply to: Message from richard at richardmanphoto.com (Richard Man) ([Leica] Grand Canyon - M9 or XPan?)
Message from tedgrant at shaw.ca (tedgrant at shaw.ca) ([Leica] Grand Canyon - M9 or XPan?)
Message from dennis.leicam6 at gmail.com (Dennis Kushner) ([Leica] Grand Canyon - M9 or XPan?)
Message from charcot at comcast.net (charcot) ([Leica] Grand Canyon - M9 or XPan?)