Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2012/03/28

[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]

Subject: [Leica] Why don't we see more large-aperture wide-angle lenses?
From: red735i at earthlink.net (Frank Filippone)
Date: Wed, 28 Mar 2012 17:08:16 -0700
References: <E79E94CF-54D6-4134-B7AB-3270E4F5F9D0@mac.com> <CAF8hL-EA=RQQqkTx2KBAeTueFAs6Rbzs9sY7RvCj59VnFw8tEw@mail.gmail.com>

Nikon and Canon both sell them....at reasonable prices....  They must be
retrofocus lenses to work on an SLR.

Maybe the problem is ... reasonable prices....

Frank Filippone
Red735i at earthlink.net
To do a wide angle fast lens, you will need retrofocus design, even for
rangefinder where there's no mirror box. The mostly symmetrical designs like
the Biogon do not scale to fast aperture. If I understand it correctly, a
retrofocus would be like putting a reducer at the back of a longer than wide
angle lens, thus adding complexity. And since fast lens make the aberration
situation worse, further complex design is needed to control them. So it's
sort of like a double whammy.




Replies: Reply from leowesson at gmail.com (Leowesson) ([Leica] Why don't we see more large-aperture wide-angle lenses?)
In reply to: Message from abridge at mac.com (Adam Bridge) ([Leica] Why don't we see more large-aperture wide-angle lenses?)
Message from richard at richardmanphoto.com (Richard Man) ([Leica] Why don't we see more large-aperture wide-angle lenses?)