Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2012/03/26

[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]
Subject: [Leica] NEX-7 vs. M9 comparison
From: imagist3 at mac.com (George Lottermoser)
Date: Mon, 26 Mar 2012 10:20:48 -0500
References: <D59E7A08-5391-4E18-9732-9809D059C33D@bex.net> <432A2EFC-0263-4091-91BE-EAE209DCD637@archiphoto.com> <3B0D4704-7D13-46B3-B3D0-966540530D6A@bex.net>
 
On Mar 26, 2012, at 6:07 AM, Howard Ritter wrote:

> But keep in mind that the segments I posted are small crops, about 1/3 of 
> the long dimension of the image, so will not approach the quality of a 
> full-sensor image.

It struck me immediately
that neither of the 1/3 portion test shots presented
come close to the quality that I see from an
M8 file
R8/DMR file
or
5D file


Regards,
George Lottermoser 
george at imagist.com
http://www.imagist.com
http://www.imagist.com/blog
http://www.linkedin.com/in/imagist
In reply to: Message from hlritter at bex.net (Howard Ritter) ([Leica] NEX-7 vs. M9 comparison)
Message from henningw at archiphoto.com (Henning Wulff) ([Leica] NEX-7 vs. M9 comparison)
Message from hlritter at bex.net (Howard Ritter) ([Leica] NEX-7 vs. M9 comparison)