Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2012/02/27

[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]

Subject: [Leica] POSTCARD: Two, in BW
From: philippe.amard at sfr.fr (philippe.amard)
Date: Mon, 27 Feb 2012 23:34:34 +0100
References: <0FB7CA4F-D62E-47C4-B0E6-1DF36E600015@sfr.fr> <CAF8hL-G=s16ChsZeudJ7sGs1+cE9uurA=Ue5DhwN6Bqqt5nDng@mail.gmail.com>

Happy they please you Richard, thanks

Philippe

Le 27 f?vr. 12 ? 22:53, Richard Man a ?crit :

> And both are excellent!
>
> On Mon, Feb 27, 2012 at 1:34 PM, philippe.amard  
> <philippe.amard at sfr.fr>wrote:
>
>> I wonder what film would have fared that "well" without a filter on  
>> the
>> lens ...
>> http://gallery.leica-users.**org/v/Phileica/Switzerland/**
>> Engie-All+that+glitters+is+**not+-7483.jpg.html<http://gallery.leica-users.org/v/Phileica/Switzerland/Engie-All+that+glitters+is+not+-7483.jpg.html
>>  
>> >
>>
>> and a thought for Jackson Pollock
>> http://gallery.leica-users.**org/v/Phileica/Switzerland/**
>> Engie-All+that+glitters+is+**not+-7508.jpg.html<http://gallery.leica-users.org/v/Phileica/Switzerland/Engie-All+that+glitters+is+not+-7508.jpg.html
>>  
>> >
>>
>> Both may be viewed large
>>
>> Bien cordialement de Metz
>> Philippe
>>
>> ______________________________**_________________
>> Leica Users Group.
>> See 
>> http://leica-users.org/**mailman/listinfo/lug<http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug
>>  
>> >for more information
>>
>
>
>
> -- 
> // richard <http://www.richardmanphoto.com>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Leica Users Group.
> See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information


In reply to: Message from philippe.amard at sfr.fr (philippe.amard) ([Leica] POSTCARD: Two, in BW)
Message from richard at richardmanphoto.com (Richard Man) ([Leica] POSTCARD: Two, in BW)