Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2012/02/09

[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]
Subject: [Leica] Nocti/0.95 is so 2009. How about a 2 LBS T0.95?
From: mark at rabinergroup.com (Mark Rabiner)
Date: Thu, 09 Feb 2012 13:06:36 -0500
 
I got my f1 Noctilux M the day before yesterday; from Glaziers in Seattle
28th August 2001 $3,495.
Whew that felt like a lot of money then!
It stayed on my camera for year. Carried it with me everywhere.
Shot thousands of pix with it and printed a slew of them it was right before
I got into inkjet mode.
3817 days ago.
So that's less then a dollar a day to feel like a friggin millionaire.

-- 
Mark R.
http://gallery.leica-users.org/v/lugalrabs/winterdays/


> From: Bob Adler <rgacpa at gmail.com>
> Reply-To: Leica Users Group <lug at leica-users.org>
> Date: Thu, 9 Feb 2012 06:52:22 -0800
> To: Leica Users Group <lug at leica-users.org>
> Subject: Re: [Leica] Nocti/0.95 is so 2009. How about a 2 LBS T0.95?
> 
> <steve.barbour at gmail.com>wrote:
> 
>> 
>> On Feb 8, 2012, at 10:37 PM, Robert Adler wrote:
>>
Replies: Reply from shino at panix.com (Rei Shinozuka) ([Leica] Nocti/0.95 is so 2009. How about a 2 LBS T0.95?)
Reply from rgacpa at gmail.com (Robert Adler) ([Leica] Nocti/0.95 is so 2009. How about a 2 LBS T0.95?)
 In reply to: Message from rgacpa at gmail.com (Robert Adler) ([Leica] Nocti/0.95 is so 2009. How about a 2 LBS T0.95?)