Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2012/02/08

[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]

Subject: [Leica] Nocti/0.95 is so 2009. How about a 2 LBS T0.95?
From: red735i at earthlink.net (Frank Filippone)
Date: Wed, 8 Feb 2012 21:38:40 -0800
References: <CAF8hL-HzJtqvN4NcSDZm3OWC4muPktx+hqXYVrm4NxFjfOeDoA@mail.gmail.com> <87E9ACCC-43A1-49B9-8DEE-9BEF85802742@gmail.com> <80F9701439F20347874CE5E4E03C22E93DEAFC4E@WHIZZMAIL02.whizz.org> <CA+=0raDXigWgWoiO3=o_Ca9yytFuC8bZ=4n=Le83aBeBXSkLYQ@mail.gmail.com> <000001cce6e4$8e4b1900$aae14b00$@chiaroscuro.co.nz> <027a01cce6e9$a10ca270$e325e750$@earthlink.net> <AB84C0F1-CF26-4C41-98A7-544CB8D1EA3E@shaw.ca>

I stand somewhat corrected......

What I should have said is:

> Price is listed as $8350 HKD..... in 4/3 mount.
> 
> That is $1076 by today's exchange rate.
> 
> US Price is $4288 USD for an M mount.
> 
> That is a LOT of HK labor hours for a different mount.......even with RF
Coupling.

Keep in mind the cheapest CV lens has this coupling, and it is the 21/4 P
Color Skopar M mount at $419 with lens elements......
Hard to justify a $3K up lift in cost because of RF coupling.

Frank Filippone
Red735i at earthlink.net


-----Original Message-----
From: lug-bounces+red735i=earthlink.net at leica-users.org
[mailto:lug-bounces+red735i=earthlink.net at leica-users.org] On Behalf Of 
John
Collier
Sent: Wednesday, February 08, 2012 9:27 PM
To: Leica Users Group
Subject: Re: [Leica] Nocti/0.95 is so 2009. How about a 2 LBS T0.95?

A 4/3 mount wouldn't require coupling to the rangefinder. I would assume
that the M mount version is coupled.

John

On 2012-02-08, at 10:13 PM, Frank Filippone wrote:

> Price is listed as $8350 HKD..... in 4/3 mount.
> 
> That is $1076 by today's exchange rate.
> 
> US Price is $4288 USD for an M mount.
> 
> That is a LOT of HK labor hours for a different mount....... 

_______________________________________________
Leica Users Group.
See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information



Replies: Reply from rgacpa at gmail.com (Robert Adler) ([Leica] Nocti/0.95 is so 2009. How about a 2 LBS T0.95?)
In reply to: Message from richard at richardmanphoto.com (Richard Man) ([Leica] Nocti/0.95 is so 2009. How about a 2 LBS T0.95?)
Message from lluisripollquerol at gmail.com (Lluis Ripoll) ([Leica] Nocti/0.95 is so 2009. How about a 2 LBS T0.95?)
Message from john at mcmaster.co.nz (John McMaster) ([Leica] Nocti/0.95 is so 2009. How about a 2 LBS T0.95?)
Message from msadat at gmail.com (mehrdad) ([Leica] Nocti/0.95 is so 2009. How about a 2 LBS T0.95?)
Message from john at chiaroscuro.co.nz (John McMaster) ([Leica] Nocti/0.95 is so 2009. How about a 2 LBS T0.95?)
Message from red735i at earthlink.net (Frank Filippone) ([Leica] Nocti/0.95 is so 2009. How about a 2 LBS T0.95?)
Message from jbcollier at shaw.ca (John Collier) ([Leica] Nocti/0.95 is so 2009. How about a 2 LBS T0.95?)