Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2012/02/08

[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]

Subject: [Leica] OT (very) The Great Prostate Debate: Does Screening Save Lives?: Scientific American
From: kanner at acm.org (Herbert Kanner)
Date: Wed, 8 Feb 2012 12:23:43 -0800
References: <1246261002.990841.1328728717446.JavaMail.root@sz0090a.westchester.pa.mail .comcast.net>

Just a comment about email: some time ago, I got in the habit of 
carefully reading an email before pushing the "send" button. How much 
I have to correct, even to rewrite, always amazes me.

Herb


>This discussion, and your post, are not at all offensive!
>
>
>
>What I find deeply offensive is the drum-beating to eliminate this
>testing, which - when properly performed and interpreted -
>absolutely saves lives. 
>
>
>
>Sorry if I was unclear - the combination of email as a medium and
>some backlog of feelings about the media blitz may have set me off a
>bit. :-)
>
>
>
>John
>
>
>
>----- Original Message -----
>
>
>From: "Steve Barbour" <steve.barbour at gmail.com>
>To: "Leica Users Group" <lug at leica-users.org>
>Sent: Wednesday, February 8, 2012 1:24:06 PM
>Subject: Re: [Leica] OT (very) The Great Prostate Debate: Does
>Screening        Save        Lives?: Scientific American
>
>
>On Feb 8, 2012, at 9:51 AM, J. Newell wrote:
>
>  >
>  >
>  > Speaking as someone whose family has a history of prostate
>cancer, and of cases where prostate cancer was correctly diagnosed
>at early stages so that treatment could be undertaken at a point
>when lives were saved, I have to say - with no personal animus
>toward anyone here - that I find this discussion extraordinarily
>offensive.
>
>
>thanks for reading it, and your input John. I am not sure why
>looking at the data and interpreting it, and discussing it,  is
>offensive.
>
>
>Steve
>
>
>  >
>  >
>  >
>  > The fact that un- or under-qualified clinicians misinterpret
>results and recommend unnecessary treatment does not change the fact
>that this screening can and does save lives if done professionally
>and responsibly.
>  >
>  >
>  >
>  > Rant off.
>  >
>  >
>  >
>  > John
>  >
>  >
>  >
>  > ----- Original Message -----
>  >
>  >
>  > From: "Steve Barbour" <steve.barbour at gmail.com>
>  > To: "LUG Group" <lug at leica-users.org>
>  > Sent: Wednesday, February 8, 2012 11:24:38 AM
>  > Subject: [Leica] OT (very) The Great Prostate Debate: Does
>Screening Save        Lives?: Scientific American
>  >
>  > keeping this important debate alive...
>  >
>  >
>  > 
> http://www.scientificamerican.com/article.cfm?id=the-great-prostate-debate
>  >
>  >
>  > _______________________________________________
>  > Leica Users Group.
>  > See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information
>  >
>  > _______________________________________________
>  > Leica Users Group.
>  > See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information
>
>
>_______________________________________________
>Leica Users Group.
>See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information
>
>_______________________________________________
>Leica Users Group.
>See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information

-- 
Herbert Kanner
kanner at acm.org
650-326-8204

Question authority and the authorities will question you.