Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2012/02/07

[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]

Subject: [Leica] leica m10
From: photo.forrest at (Phil Forrest)
Date: Tue, 7 Feb 2012 15:29:51 -0500
References: <> <>

I think the best upgrade would be an accessory, not unlike the
Leicavit, in which extended battery life could be gotten from. Either
by a new totally rechargeable set of Li-Ion Leica-specific cells or by
6-8 rechargeable batteries available easily on the drugstore shelf. The
ability to use Alkaline, Lithium and NiMH batteries could be added via
a regulator switch in the new battery pack body.
I've been dreaming of something like this for a few years now but no
one has come up with it for some reason. I'm no electrical engineer,
nor do i have the tools or materials to fashion the chassis of this
battery pack.
But THIS is what we need, for existing M8 and M9 bodies, not an M10.

Phil Forrest

On Tue, 7 Feb 2012 18:50:41 +0000 (GMT)
FRANK DERNIE <frank.dernie at> wrote:

> I don't actually -need- any of those :-)
> I would like a better buffer and speed but I suspect the price we
> have for the digital M being so small is no space for a big battery
> and not much power to drive faster chips. I am not so sure that
> battery technology has moved on far enough to resolve this. If it
> needed to be bigger of heavier I would stay with the smaller buffer
> since it is only rarely a limitation for me. I also like the idea of
> a built in 1.4 magnifier.
> I am actually pretty happy with my M9. It is overall the best camera
> I have ever owned. FD
> >________________________________
> > From: mehrdad <msadat at>
> >To: Leica Users Group <lug at> 
> >Sent: Tuesday, 7 February 2012, 18:36
> >Subject: [Leica] leica m10
> > 
> >it seems that the new m digital is around the corner (sep/oct), what
> >shall we expect after three years and 8k price?
> >
> >
> >i for one do need the following
> >
> >
> >1) image stabilization built in to the body (they can licsnce this
> >technology? from sony, thier old partner)
> >2) much better buffer and more frames per second
> >3) shooting movies with m (not for me)
> >4) fuji x10/pro like view finder
> >5) better battery life and better battery
> >6) 36 meg is now the norm, so something close
> >7) a built in 1.4x magnifier, that u can use at will
> >8) all the given dynamic range and high iso performance (it is now
> >three yrs later)
> >9) a better price but i think is is truly a dream
> >10) do we care about live view?
> >-- 
> >? -------------------------------------
> >? regards, mehrdad
> >
> >_______________________________________________
> >Leica Users Group.
> >See for more information
> >
> >
> >
> _______________________________________________
> Leica Users Group.
> See for more information

Replies: Reply from red735i at (Frank Filippone) ([Leica] leica m10)
Reply from photo at (Nathan Wajsman) ([Leica] leica m10)
In reply to: Message from msadat at (mehrdad) ([Leica] leica m10)
Message from frank.dernie at (FRANK DERNIE) ([Leica] leica m10)