Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2012/01/19

[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]

Subject: [Leica] IMG: Date Farmer
From: hopsternew at gmail.com (Geoff Hopkinson)
Date: Fri, 20 Jan 2012 06:47:37 +1000
References: <CA+yJO1DQQf-swYP4CHL7V8oGk7nSCd8_vtH44JTENwmbRYEVFw@mail.gmail.com> <47AF1041703B4F2B86CA1E6AD7299174@jimnichols> <CAF8hL-FaLvMWv1tu2qjd66zW9cP6Sfv5+ET2SR90mP2sC-JEyA@mail.gmail.com>

I'll be the heretic dissenter and say that the palm tree tends to be lost
since it is so tonally similar to the rest of frame.
But you are starting here from BW neg I think (?) so that may be moot. A BW
conversion from colour of course would have more options in developing.

Mit freundlichen Gruessen
Geoff
http://www.pbase.com/hoppyman



On 20 January 2012 05:49, Richard Man <richard at richardmanphoto.com> wrote:

> I like #2 and I do agree that the shadow can be open a little?
>
>
> --
> // richard <http://www.richardmanphoto.com>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Leica Users Group.
> See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information
>


Replies: Reply from philippe.amard at sfr.fr (philippe.amard) ([Leica] IMG: Date Farmer)
In reply to: Message from images at comporium.net (Tina Manley) ([Leica] IMG: Date Farmer)
Message from jhnichols at lighttube.net (Jim Nichols) ([Leica] IMG: Date Farmer)
Message from richard at richardmanphoto.com (Richard Man) ([Leica] IMG: Date Farmer)