Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2012/01/07
[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]If they're paying top photographers to use the M9, I want to know where my M9 and money are! :D -- Chris Crawford Fine Art Photography Fort Wayne, Indiana 260-437-8990 http://www.chriscrawfordphoto.com My portfolio http://blog.chriscrawfordphoto.com My latest work! http://www.facebook.com/pages/Christopher-Crawford/48229272798 Become a fan on Facebook On 1/7/12 3:27 AM, "Mark Rabiner" <mark at rabinergroup.com> wrote: >I got my Leica in 1993. I got my first digital a D100 in 2003. And I got >my >very first Nikon an F2 in 1972. >I thought this was a discussion about iso. Not a comparison between M's >and >F's. But if it is a comparison between M's and F's I'm pretty aware of >them >as anyone you're going to find having shot thousands of rolls with both. >And >digital makes it way different becuae you can shoot at way lower light >with >way lower shutter speeds. Don't know why. But you can. Do its hard to >compare all the way back to film. If I knew how things would be going I'd >have never gotten my Noctilux in 2001. Things change fast. >The Sensor in the M9 just like those in the Canons and Nikon DSLR's will >be >upgraded soon enough. Its a continuous process. Things get better on >farily >regular intervals. though for some I'm sure very good reason the sensor >development on the M9 is stuck a bit. The time will come soon enough with >Solms announces a new sensor competitive with those in an EOS 1D Mark IV >or >D4 or 700. When that happens they'll not be paying top photographers to >use >M9's any more it will be the other way around. > >-- >Mark R. >http://gallery.leica-users.org/v/lugalrabs/winterdays/ > > >> From: Philippe Amard <philippe.amard at sfr.fr> >> Reply-To: Leica Users Group <lug at leica-users.org> >> Date: Sat, 7 Jan 2012 08:50:14 +0100 >> To: Leica Users Group <lug at leica-users.org> >> Subject: Re: [Leica] Nikon D4 >> >> 2 stops is what you need to get from 1/15th to 1/60 where you get less >> blur with a mirror body, especially nikon BTW >> ph >> >> Le 7 janv. 12 ? 01:16, Mark Rabiner a ?crit : >> >>> But we have to be up on our logarithmics. I'm not. >>> I thought iso 64,000 was going to be a world away from 16,ooo. >>> Its only two stops! Which is tri x instead of plus x. big deal! >>> Sounded to me at first like the difference between Pan F and pushed >>> Tmax >>> 3200! >>> But it just ain't true. >>> >>> -- >>> Mark R. >>> http://gallery.leica-users.org/v/lugalrabs/winterdays/ >>> >>> >>>> From: Adam Bridge <abridge at mac.com> >>>> Reply-To: Leica Users Group <lug at leica-users.org> >>>> Date: Fri, 06 Jan 2012 16:06:15 -0800 >>>> To: Leica Users Group <lug at leica-users.org> >>>> Subject: Re: [Leica] Nikon D4 >>>> >>>> ISO 204,000????? >>>> >>>> f8 just became a fast lens.... >>>> >>>> Adam >>>> >>>> On Jan 5, 2012, at 8:45 PM, Jayanand Govindaraj wrote: >>>> >>>>> Its official: >>>>> >>>>> mynikonlife.com.au/gear/digital-slr-cameras/d4 >>>>> >>>>> Cheers >>>>> Jayanand >>>>> >>>>> _______________________________________________ >>>>> Leica Users Group. >>>>> See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information >>>> >>>> >>>> _______________________________________________ >>>> Leica Users Group. >>>> See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information >>> >>> >>> >>> _______________________________________________ >>> Leica Users Group. >>> See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information >> >> _______________________________________________ >> Leica Users Group. >> See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information > > > >_______________________________________________ >Leica Users Group. >See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information