Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2012/01/05

[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]

Subject: [Leica] The Fuji XPRO-1
From: r.s.taylor at comcast.net (Richard Taylor)
Date: Thu, 5 Jan 2012 11:36:55 -0500
References: <CAF8hL-EYfK2dNmLeEBZkof1kHa1rFt-756=Osfq3gwOx+24H=w@mail.gmail.com> <80F9701439F20347874CE5E4E03C22E93661791A@WhizzMAIL01.whizz.org> <CAF8hL-Fpr3R-fyb6zE9fC5cVVUD+uxLZn6BMqaZr9c6wuB6QMA@mail.gmail.com> <2D9ED001-7160-4CD3-88E1-D7D428DA9F25@mac.com> <op.v7l71txnqcd5uq@colinb.office.supranet.net>

I've been lurking and following these developments here and on various rumor 
sites.  All of a sudden we're getting a whole bunch of RF-like large sensor 
cameras that are opening all kinds of doors for those of us who still have a 
bunch of Leica lenses sitting in a drawer and just refuse to spend $7K on an 
M9 body.  

First the X-100,* then the NEX's, now the XPRO, and soon the Leica "X-???" 
mirrorless supposedly coming in the Fall.  There's too much happening too 
fast.  

Personally, I'm sticking with my micro-4/3rds stuff--just got a GX-1, in 
fact--and will wait and see what happens at Photokina.  

I just did a wedding book for my nephew and his new bride.  The 12" X 20" 
wraparound cover shot of the bride's bouquet was taken with my GF-1 and 25mm 
Summilux at f2.0 and ISO 400.  It is tack sharp at that size. 

For the moment, anyway, that's all I need but am still very much looking 
forward to what Leica comes up with this Fall.  

The GX-1 is a little rocket, BTW.    

Regards, 

Dick

*I know, no interchangeable lenses, but the first of the breed.  


On Jan 05, 2012, at 9:33 AM, Colin Baker wrote:

> On Thu, 05 Jan 2012 07:52:35 -0600, George Lottermoser <imagist3 at 
> mac.com> wrote:
>> 
>> On Jan 5, 2012, at 1:43 AM, Richard Man wrote:
>> 
>>> Because a lot of the new M9 owners bought them because it's the "best
>>> camera" there is, and now there's "one better."
>> 
>> But last week they were saying that about the Sony Nex-7
>> (over on the RFF list).
>> 
>> Someone should keep a "one better" calendar.
> 
> I really only had two complaints about the initial NEX lineup - no 
> practical way to trigger off-camera flash, and poor performance with 
> wide-angle RF lenses.  Everybody thought the NEX-7 would address both of 
> these issues, but as it turned out, the 7 addressed only one and the 5n 
> addressed the other.  That frustrated me (and I'm sure many others), and 
> led us to say "well, let's see what Fuji and Ricoh come up with."
> 
> So that's where I'm at, still waiting for that one digital solution to 
> replace both my NEX-3 and my Nikon DSLR (since I'll never have the 
> discipline to save for an M9).
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Leica Users Group.
> See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information



Replies: Reply from imagist3 at mac.com (George Lottermoser) ([Leica] The Fuji XPRO-1)
In reply to: Message from richard at richardmanphoto.com (Richard Man) ([Leica] The Fuji XPRO-1)
Message from john at mcmaster.co.nz (John McMaster) ([Leica] The Fuji XPRO-1)
Message from richard at richardmanphoto.com (Richard Man) ([Leica] The Fuji XPRO-1)
Message from imagist3 at mac.com (George Lottermoser) ([Leica] The Fuji XPRO-1)
Message from colin at colinbaker.org (Colin Baker) ([Leica] The Fuji XPRO-1)