Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2011/12/08

[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]

Subject: [Leica] OT? well not that much
From: charcot at comcast.net (Charcot)
Date: Thu, 8 Dec 2011 20:58:31 -0700
References: <9439EF63-A54E-4291-B33E-B89EECEF0185@sfr.fr> <CAH1UNJ2h_eob7P11ZRgveo6pfwsjZw1TX-BwnSs19n1XQgT8wA@mail.gmail.com>

is anyone disturbed by the 28-600 mm lens - like I really believe that you 
can get decent quality with that wide a range - OTOH I 've never used this 
camera and maybe it's all that it's cracked up to be.  

Doubtful in Denver

ernie
On Dec 8, 2011, at 8:43 PM, Jayanand Govindaraj wrote:

> What is the Panasonic equivalent?
> Cheers
> Jayanand
> 
> On Fri, Dec 9, 2011 at 12:40 AM, philippe.amard <philippe.amard at 
> sfr.fr>wrote:
> 
>> or is it?
>> 
>> http://tinyurl.com/d2asuzb
>> 
>> Philippe :-(
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> ______________________________**_________________
>> Leica Users Group.
>> See 
>> http://leica-users.org/**mailman/listinfo/lug<http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug>for
>>  more information
>> 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Leica Users Group.
> See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information



Replies: Reply from jayanand at gmail.com (Jayanand Govindaraj) ([Leica] OT? well not that much)
In reply to: Message from philippe.amard at sfr.fr (philippe.amard) ([Leica] OT? well not that much)
Message from jayanand at gmail.com (Jayanand Govindaraj) ([Leica] OT? well not that much)