Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2011/11/15
[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]Kodak actually got this to me overnight at ground rates. On Tue, Nov 15, 2011 at 5:12 PM, charcot <charcot at comcast.net> wrote: > Interesting - I told my wife to expect a package in the mail that was 400 > ft of movie film - I told her that it was for my camera but she was > confused - wanted to know when the Cine camera was coming? After I > searched the used lists and found something for $4-5K she knew I was nuts > and asked "really - what ARE you doing with that much film?" > > Hoping to go out this w/e with film in camera - still that is > > ernie nitka > > On 11/15/2011 1:31 PM, Chris Saganich wrote: > >> Phil F. gave me some double X down at OWS a few weeks ago and I finally >> developed and scanned the role. I guessed at the development time, using >> my normal TriX routine and was about 2 stops off. This was OK for many of >> the images since I'm somewhat loose with the exposure. I posted some >> examples here along with a curve from a couple zone tested exposures I >> normally make when exposing new film so next time I'll get it right. >> >> http://www.imagebrooklyn.com/**film_testing/DXXD23Test.htm<http://www.imagebrooklyn.com/film_testing/DXXD23Test.htm> >> >> These are scanned using Dimage 5400 so it handles the extra highlight >> density very well. I didn;t do any post processing other then Tiff to JPG, >> resize, and USM. >> >> Some are correct exposure and development and the others are N+2. >> >> > > ______________________________**_________________ > Leica Users Group. > See > http://leica-users.org/**mailman/listinfo/lug<http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug>for > more information >