Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2011/10/29

[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]

Subject: [Leica] film again!!
From: photo at frozenlight.eu (Nathan Wajsman)
Date: Sun, 30 Oct 2011 07:47:24 +0100
References: <BLU155-W4166F7A4009D2C846D08408DD00@phx.gbl>

The pics are nice, Jean-Michel, but I do not think that they are better than 
they would have been with digital. I maintain that for colour photography, 
digital is superior to film (at least when we are looking at 35mm).

Cheers,
Nathan

Nathan Wajsman
Alicante, Spain
http://www.frozenlight.eu
http://www.greatpix.eu
http://www.nathanfoto.com
PICTURE OF THE WEEK: http://www.fotocycle.dk/paws
Blog: http://nathansmusings.wordpress.com/


YNWA



On Oct 29, 2011, at 3:12 PM, Jean-Michel Mertz wrote:

> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> I've just posted a series on Venice - film, leica IIIc (1946), Elmar 35 - 
> 3,5 (1938) ... Well, I was wondering whether film did not, sometimes, 
> depending on available light, time of day, etc. put digital to shame ... ? 
> Thanks for your comments (the pics are classic postcards of a place 
> everyone has photographed hundreds of times!).
> Jean-Michel
> 
> <http://gallery.leica-users.org/v/Jean-Michel/VENISE/F1000031.jpg.html>
> 
> 
> 
>                                         
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Leica Users Group.
> See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information
> 



In reply to: Message from j2m46 at hotmail.fr (Jean-Michel Mertz) ([Leica] film again!!)