Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2011/10/11
[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]I was particularly surprised for example that there wasn't a lot of difference between the Panasonic GH2 and the M9, just looking at the high ISO images. I know that these aren't real-world tests and that high ISO is not why you buy an M9. Still, I wasn't expecting them to be so close. As a long time Leica user I'm not trying to bash the M9. Just, well, surprised. Mike D On 10/11/11 8:34 PM, Nathan Wajsman wrote: > In what way were you surprised, Mike? That some of them outperformed the > M9 at high ISO? > > Cheers, > Nathan > > On 12 Oct, 2011, at 2:25 , Mike Durling wrote: > >> DPreview has a nice feature where you can compare identical test shots >> taken with different cameras. You can select the base ISO and pan around >> the image to see how each camera images details and brightness ranges. >> Obviously its only one data point in comparing camera systems, but I love >> to bump the ISO up to 1600 and see how each camera does on this >> particular test. >> >> The main page: >> http://www.dpreview.com/news/1110/11101110leicam9comparisonshots.asp pits >> the M9 against some other full frame cameras. I was pretty surprised >> comparing it against some smaller sensor models. >> >> Mike D >> >> _______________________________________________ >> Leica Users Group. >> See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information >> > Nathan Wajsman > Alicante, Spain > http://www.frozenlight.eu > http://www.greatpix.eu > http://www.nathanfoto.com > > Books: http://www.blurb.com/bookstore/search?search=wajsman&x=0&y=0 > PICTURE OF THE WEEK: http://www.fotocycle.dk/paws > Image licensing: http://www.alamy.com/search-results.asp?qt=wajsman > Blog: http://www.nathansmusings.eu > > > > > > _______________________________________________ > Leica Users Group. > See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information >