Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2011/09/28

[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]

Subject: [Leica] Kodak in trouble? What does this mean for Leica?
From: photo.forrest at earthlink.net (Phil Forrest)
Date: Wed, 28 Sep 2011 23:20:41 -0400
References: <63C28AFB-46A8-4F3A-ABD1-D58A638C0660@mac.com> <CAA94ADD.14F77%mark@rabinergroup.com> <20110928225934.3c82e5ff@linux-pfy5.site> <CAF8hL-FOYdkcbmTQF8ttsvSF0Jks_YEnXCSaE5Xv4xLKOytksw@mail.gmail.com> <fec4b1a1da2846e35e009feb689c407e@mail.gmail.com>

The images could be licensed and sold for cool cell phone covers?
Ugh, dark times.

Phil Forrest



On Wed, 28 Sep 2011 23:14:00 -0400
Jim Shulman <jshulman at judgecrater.com> wrote:

> My main concern about Kodak's possible demise is the fate of George
> Eastman House, with its incredible collections.  Who would keep that
> afloat?
> 
> Jim Shulman
> Wynnewood, PA


Replies: Reply from jshulman at judgecrater.com (Jim Shulman) ([Leica] Kodak in trouble? What does this mean for Leica?)
In reply to: Message from imagist3 at mac.com (George Lottermoser) ([Leica] Kodak in trouble? What does this mean for Leica?)
Message from mark at rabinergroup.com (Mark Rabiner) ([Leica] Kodak in trouble? What does this mean for Leica?)
Message from photo.forrest at earthlink.net (Phil Forrest) ([Leica] Kodak in trouble? What does this mean for Leica?)
Message from richard at imagecraft.com (Richard Man) ([Leica] Kodak in trouble? What does this mean for Leica?)
Message from jshulman at judgecrater.com (Jim Shulman) ([Leica] Kodak in trouble? What does this mean for Leica?)