Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2011/08/22

[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]

Subject: [Leica] Leica vs. Canon
From: mark at rabinergroup.com (Mark Rabiner)
Date: Tue, 23 Aug 2011 00:31:59 -0400

The flat fuzzy Cedar Waxwing the culprit could have been the famously
shockingly inferior Canon optics that all those stupid photographers use
every day or it could be image processing or lack of or low shudder speed or
lower flatter light or a lots of other things. Forgetting to unsharp
mask....

-- 
Mark R.
http://gallery.leica-users.org/v/lugalrabs/



> From: Peter Cheyne <geordiepete211 at yahoo.co.uk>
> Reply-To: Leica Users Group <lug at leica-users.org>
> Date: Tue, 23 Aug 2011 13:23:31 +0900
> To: Leica Users Group <lug at leica-users.org>
> Subject: [Leica] Leica vs. Canon
> 
> Hi Doug,
> 
> the 1st, 2nd, and 5th ones look a better quality to me.
> 
> Peter
> 
> 
> ..............
> Hmmm... lots of variables involved including films, subjects and
> lighting,
> but let's see how perceptive LUGgers are.  Some of these were made
> with a
> Leica lens, some with a Canon lens.
> 
> http://www.wildlightphoto.com/birds/phasianidae/rnphea01.html
> http://www.wildlightphoto.com/mammals/artiodactyls/btde03.html
> http://www.wildlightphoto.com/birds/bombycillidae/cewa00.html
> http://www.wildlightphoto.com/birds/tyrannidae/blph01.html
> http://www.wildlightphoto.com/birds/phasianidae/sogrou02.html
> 
> Doug Herr
> Sacramento
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Leica Users Group.
> See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information




Replies: Reply from photo at frozenlight.eu (Nathan Wajsman) ([Leica] Leica vs. Canon)
In reply to: Message from geordiepete211 at yahoo.co.uk (Peter Cheyne) ([Leica] Leica vs. Canon)