Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2011/08/22

[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]

Subject: [Leica] Film
From: lew1716 at gmail.com (Lew Schwartz)
Date: Mon, 22 Aug 2011 23:01:53 -0400
References: <000101cc5f98$35c3bdb0$a14b3910$@chiaroscuro.co.nz> <CA75D887.139C9%mark@rabinergroup.com> <CAF8hL-E-k2Ke45nAouNtJUjty6dbpe-jtz1i1bLOdjTuPV5_pw@mail.gmail.com>

The dynamic range of film still beats digital in my experience. I
believe this is why you'll see many high end digital gear using fill
flash in overhead sunlight.

On Mon, Aug 22, 2011 at 10:43 PM, Richard Man <richard at imagecraft.com> 
wrote:
> Mark, if you think about it, he is clearly comparing your favorite subject 
> -
> that one film camera, it's 24x36mm "sensor" or larger, rather than most
> people using finger nail sized sensor, or even 4/3, or APS-C.
>
> So yes, most analog photographs have more depth and not as stupid and
> insipid as it sounds.
>
>
>
> --
> // richard <http://www.imagecraft.com/>
> // icc blog: <http://imagecraft.com/blog/>
> // richard's personal photo blog: <http://www.5pmlight.com>
> [ For technical support on ImageCraft products, please include all previous
> replies in your msgs. ]
>
> _______________________________________________
> Leica Users Group.
> See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information
>


In reply to: Message from john at chiaroscuro.co.nz (John McMaster) ([Leica] Film)
Message from mark at rabinergroup.com (Mark Rabiner) ([Leica] Film)
Message from richard at imagecraft.com (Richard Man) ([Leica] Film)