Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2011/08/15

[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]

Subject: [Leica] D700 or D7000
From: Frank.Dernie at btinternet.com (Frank Dernie)
Date: Mon, 15 Aug 2011 11:01:14 +0100
References: <CA6E399C.135D8%mark@rabinergroup.com>

You're welcome Mark!
A bit grumpy when I woke this morning.

On 15 Aug, 2011, at 07:49, Mark Rabiner wrote:

> Thanks Frank !
> -- 
> Mark R.
> 
> 
> 
>> From: Frank Dernie <Frank.Dernie at btinternet.com>
>> Reply-To: Leica Users Group <lug at leica-users.org>
>> Date: Mon, 15 Aug 2011 06:52:44 +0100
>> To: Leica Users Group <lug at leica-users.org>
>> Subject: Re: [Leica] D700 or D7000
>> 
>> Dear sweet Jesus Mark, I hope you soon get as tired of writing this same 
>> old
>> rant several times a day as the hundreds of us get tired of reading it, 
>> over
>> and over and over again.
>> Please?
>> Frank
>> 
>> 
>> On 14 Aug, 2011, at 22:17, Mark Rabiner wrote:
>> 
>>> Perhaps you have a professional photographer in mind who shoots macro or
>>> anything with a 4/3's system camera?
>>> Which by the way is a .3 millimeter away from the notorious pocket
>>> instamatic format which brought home photography to its knees in 1972.
>>> 13x17mm's  Making for lots more work shooting family pictures for up and
>>> coming photographers. The dads were crippled. It was the silver scandal. 
>>> Not
>>> its the 4/3's format scandal.
>>> We must save hard disk space its the green thing to do!
>>> -- 
>>> Mark R.
>> 
>> 
>> _______________________________________________
>> Leica Users Group.
>> See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information
> 
> 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Leica Users Group.
> See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information



In reply to: Message from mark at rabinergroup.com (Mark Rabiner) ([Leica] D700 or D7000)